There is a world somewhere between reality and fiction. Although ignored by many, it is very real and so are those living in it. This forum is about the natural world. Here, wild animals will be heard and respected. The forum offers a glimpse into an unknown world as well as a room with a view on the present and the future. Anyone able to speak on behalf of those living in the emerald forest and the deep blue sea is invited to join.
--- Peter Broekhuijsen ---

  • 2 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Cave Lion (Panthera spelaea and Panthera fossilis)

Venezuela epaiva Offline
Moderator
*****
Moderators
#76
( This post was last modified: 09-04-2017, 08:36 AM by epaiva )

Cave Lion skeleton in Natural History Museum of Vienna, credit to @vienna_flamingo


*This image is copyright of its original author
4 users Like epaiva's post
Reply

Venezuela epaiva Offline
Moderator
*****
Moderators
#77
( This post was last modified: 10-26-2017, 08:35 AM by epaiva )

Cave Lion skulls, a series of them housed at the St Petersburg museum in Russia.
Credit to @joshuabalize


*This image is copyright of its original author
6 users Like epaiva's post
Reply

United States tigerluver Offline
Prehistoric Feline Expert
*****
Moderators
#78

Frozen Remains of Extinct Lion Found in Russia




7 users Like tigerluver's post
Reply

United States tigerluver Offline
Prehistoric Feline Expert
*****
Moderators
#79
( This post was last modified: 11-14-2017, 08:30 AM by tigerluver )

Gigantic lion, Panthera leo, from the Pleistocene of Natodomeri, eastern Africa

This is the paper which we referenced a while back.


*This image is copyright of its original author


*This image is copyright of its original author

I attempted a crude overlay over a barbary lion skull.

*This image is copyright of its original author
7 users Like tigerluver's post
Reply

United States Polar Offline
Polar Bear Enthusiast
****
#80

@tigerluver,

From post #79, is it actually possible for scientists to clone from solidified, partially deformed flesh of animals that were frozen? I remember reading about some in Russia who dug a preserved mammoth (and an actual rhino and steppe bison) and were attempting to clone it, but no responses about their progress so far...
3 users Like Polar's post
Reply

United States tigerluver Offline
Prehistoric Feline Expert
*****
Moderators
#81

@Polar , last I checked, the frozen DNA is still not 100% complete usually (I'd expect the same for this cub). So the closest thing to cloning to full animal we have now is inserting the genes into the closest relative and coming out with a hybrid. If I remember correctly, mammoth cloning has been proposed under this basis, where we won't have a true mammoth but something between a modern elephant and a mammoth.
3 users Like tigerluver's post
Reply

United States Polar Offline
Polar Bear Enthusiast
****
#82

So in order to possibly clone something similar to the Cave Lion, and we know that the Cave Lion is more related to extant lions (from both continents), we can extract Cave Lion DNA and put it within a modern lion's embryo and see it grow? That sounds pretty interesting, although since the Cave Lion is extinct, we wouldn't know what exact effects intermixing between the two would have, similar to the interbreeding between a lion and tiger which reduces fertility and encourages ridiculous sizes. So the "clone" could not even resemble a perfect mix between the two.
3 users Like Polar's post
Reply

Canada GrizzlyClaws Offline
Canine Expert
*****
Moderators
#83

@tigerluver

What is your own interpretation about the size of the giant Pleistocene African lions?

BTW, it seems they were morphologically closer to the northern branch of Panthera leo, maybe the northern branch has simply preserved more archaic traits compared to the southern branch.
3 users Like GrizzlyClaws's post
Reply

United States Polar Offline
Polar Bear Enthusiast
****
#84

(11-14-2017, 11:59 AM)GrizzlyClaws Wrote: @tigerluver

What is your own interpretation about the size of the giant Pleistocene African lions?

BTW, it seems they were morphologically closer to the northern branch of Panthera leo, maybe the northern branch has simply preserved more archaic traits compared to the southern branch.

African lions were bigger back then? Didn't know that. I know for sure that ancient Asian lions were bigger before.

The northern branch of lions had particularly larger manes than southern counterparts, but I don't know if the Barbary/Asian lions are significantly (or were) ever bigger than the African lions on average. 

Northern lions also tend to have a slightly more rounded skull and smoother mandibular edges (much like tigers) compared to mainland African lions, and some of these Pleistocene African lions had those same features. 

Is there a thread which goes further into the other differences between Barbary and Sub-Saharan lions?
3 users Like Polar's post
Reply

Canada GrizzlyClaws Offline
Canine Expert
*****
Moderators
#85

(11-14-2017, 12:18 PM)Polar Wrote:
(11-14-2017, 11:59 AM)GrizzlyClaws Wrote: @tigerluver

What is your own interpretation about the size of the giant Pleistocene African lions?

BTW, it seems they were morphologically closer to the northern branch of Panthera leo, maybe the northern branch has simply preserved more archaic traits compared to the southern branch.

African lions were bigger back then? Didn't know that. I know for sure that ancient Asian lions were bigger before.

The northern branch of lions had particularly larger manes than southern counterparts, but I don't know if the Barbary/Asian lions are significantly (or were) ever bigger than the African lions on average. 

Northern lions also tend to have a slightly more rounded skull and smoother mandibular edges (much like tigers) compared to mainland African lions, and some of these Pleistocene African lions had those same features. 

Is there a thread which goes further into the other differences between Barbary and Sub-Saharan lions?

Although the authors didn’t directly conclude its relationship with the modern lions, but it is quite likely this population could be considered ancestral to the modern lions. Since the timeline looks quite consistent with the emergence and divergence of the modern lion populations.

Probably the northern branch of the modern lions had inherited more distinct traits of their ancestors.
6 users Like GrizzlyClaws's post
Reply

United States tigerluver Offline
Prehistoric Feline Expert
*****
Moderators
#86

@GrizzlyClaws , with an estimated basal length of 380 mm (from the text, the scale on the image seems to be quite off), this would be a very large cat. The box and whisker plot sums up this lion's position well as compared even if all the giants we know of on record were not used. CBL is usually 20-30 mm more than basal length thus the CBL of this skull would be around 405 mm. The GSL would be around 450 mm. That's a smidge less than that largest skulls of P. atrox most are aware of (458 mm) and a bit smaller than the giant Mokhnevskaya P. fossilis skull (475 mm) and University of California giant P. atrox skull (467.5 mm).

If we say a 200 kg lion with skull of CBL of 340 mm, by isometry this lion would have weighed 340 kg. I've inflated the skull size to weight ratio of the isometric comparison as these lions were probably more robust than their modern counterparts, thus a smaller CBL base should be attached the the 200 kg weight.

This skull goes back to the point that the lion's huge size is African in origin, not Eurasian. We have the giant P. shawi from south Africa that I've mentioned earlier and in the main posts. This Natodomeri specimen shows that the giant size potential was still there a million years later. Probability also hints that if a single skull found such a big specimen, there must've been larger specimens. Maybe this wasn't the case, but we have some reason to believe the African lions of the late Pleistocene outsize the cave lions up north. As always, more specimens will give us a better look.

Either this weekend or the upcoming thanksgiving, I'll try to get some ratios on this skull and see which species it sits most closely with.
7 users Like tigerluver's post
Reply

United States Polar Offline
Polar Bear Enthusiast
****
#87

(11-15-2017, 10:03 PM)tigerluver Wrote: @GrizzlyClaws , with an estimated basal length of 380 mm (from the text, the scale on the image seems to be quite off), this would be a very large cat. The box and whisker plot sums up this lion's position well as compared even if all the giants we know of on record were not used. CBL is usually 20-30 mm more than basal length thus the CBL of this skull would be around 405 mm. The GSL would be around 450 mm. That's a smidge less than that largest skulls of P. atrox most are aware of (458 mm) and a bit smaller than the giant Mokhnevskaya P. fossilis skull (475 mm) and University of California giant P. atrox skull (467.5 mm).

If we say a 200 kg lion with skull of CBL of 340 mm, by isometry this lion would have weighed 340 kg. I've inflated the skull size to weight ratio of the isometric comparison as these lions were probably more robust than their modern counterparts, thus a smaller CBL base should be attached the the 200 kg weight.

This skull goes back to the point that the lion's huge size is African in origin, not Eurasian. We have the giant P. shawi from south Africa that I've mentioned earlier and in the main posts. This Natodomeri specimen shows that the giant size potential was still there a million years later. Probability also hints that if a single skull found such a big specimen, there must've been larger specimens. Maybe this wasn't the case, but we have some reason to believe the African lions of the late Pleistocene outsize the cave lions up north. As always, more specimens will give us a better look.

Either this weekend or the upcoming thanksgiving, I'll try to get some ratios on this skull and see which species it sits most closely with.

Did the African Lions of the Pleistocene also lack manes or were they fully evolved by then (with the mane)?
4 users Like Polar's post
Reply

Canada GrizzlyClaws Offline
Canine Expert
*****
Moderators
#88
( This post was last modified: 11-16-2017, 05:14 AM by GrizzlyClaws )

@tigerluver

This summarizes perfectly, and ironically, Africa as the ultimate homeland for all lion stem groups, yet the lion fossil records over there was by far less studied compared to those from Eurasia and America.

BTW, I guess the 475 mm giant skull of Mokhnevskaya Cave was eventually classified as a late form of Panthera fossilis. Thus, this makes the largest Panthera spelaea skull 451 mm, and the only available skull of the Pleistocene African lions now match the largest recorded skull of Panthera spelaea, yet fall short against the largest recorded skulls for Panthera fossilis and Panthera atrox, but we might expect those even larger specimens to be discovered in a foreseeable future.

Quote:Thus, apart from the mandible from Kuznetsk Basin, distribution of lions with features resembling P. fossilis in the Pleistocene of Asia is confirmed by the presence of P. youngi in ZKD-1 and the findings of very large forms in the Kurtak archeological area and in the Mid-dle Ural Mountains (Mokhnevskaya Cave).

First Asian record of Panthera (Leo) fossilis (Mammalia, Carnivora, Felidae) in the Early Pleistocene of Western Siberia, Russia (PDF Download Available).

Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259545849_First_Asian_record_of_Panthera_Leo_fossilis_Mammalia_Carnivora_Felidae_in_the_Early_Pleistocene_of_Western_Siberia_Russia [accessed Nov 15 2017].
7 users Like GrizzlyClaws's post
Reply

United States tigerluver Offline
Prehistoric Feline Expert
*****
Moderators
#89

@Polar , no one really knows for sure when the African lion got its mane. The best way to do that would be to figure out what gene is responsible for the mane then see how old that mutation is. I've not yet to see any paper on that as that is quite a difficult and possibly expensive feat. This is also the first time an African lion fossil how show'd something very large. While P. shawi has been there, most scientists don't know of its existence and if they do, most never paid attention to its size as it's just a fragment of a humerus.
3 users Like tigerluver's post
Reply

Canada GrizzlyClaws Offline
Canine Expert
*****
Moderators
#90
( This post was last modified: 11-16-2017, 06:34 AM by GrizzlyClaws )

(11-16-2017, 05:32 AM)tigerluver Wrote: @Polar , no one really knows for sure when the African lion got its mane. The best way to do that would be to figure out what gene is responsible for the mane then see how old that mutation is. I've not yet to see any paper on that as that is quite a difficult and possibly expensive feat. This is also the first time an African lion fossil how show'd something very large. While P. shawi has been there, most scientists don't know of its existence and if they do, most never paid attention to its size as it's just a fragment of a humerus.

Since both southern/northern branch share the same mutation, so this mutation definitely happened prior the divergence of the southern/northern branch which occurred around 110 kya.

Now the giant prehistoric African lion fossils dated back to 196 kya, so the question about the mane status for the prehistoric African lions has definitely become an intriguing one. So it could be either contemporary to the giant African lions or occurred right after the size recession of the population.
4 users Like GrizzlyClaws's post
Reply






Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

About Us
Go Social     Subscribe  

Welcome to WILDFACT forum, a website that focuses on sharing the joy that wildlife has on offer. We welcome all wildlife lovers to join us in sharing that joy. As a member you can share your research, knowledge and experience on animals with the community.
wildfact.com is intended to serve as an online resource for wildlife lovers of all skill levels from beginners to professionals and from all fields that belong to wildlife anyhow. Our focus area is wild animals from all over world. Content generated here will help showcase the work of wildlife experts and lovers to the world. We believe by the help of your informative article and content we will succeed to educate the world, how these beautiful animals are important to survival of all man kind.
Many thanks for visiting wildfact.com. We hope you will keep visiting wildfact regularly and will refer other members who have passion for wildlife.

Forum software by © MyBB