There is a world somewhere between reality and fiction. Although ignored by many, it is very real and so are those living in it. This forum is about the natural world. Here, wild animals will be heard and respected. The forum offers a glimpse into an unknown world as well as a room with a view on the present and the future. Anyone able to speak on behalf of those living in the emerald forest and the deep blue sea is invited to join.
--- Peter Broekhuijsen ---

  • 2 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Largest Living wild lions ?

United States Pckts Offline
Bigcat Enthusiast
******
#46

(08-22-2014, 06:25 AM)'chaos' Wrote:
(08-21-2014, 10:30 PM)'tigerluver' Wrote: What's the exact source of the 250 kg Private Nature Reserve specimen? Never heard of that one.


 


Ahhhh come on now Pockets. You and I have locked horns on this very topic many times. The 283 kg - stomach content included - lion
weighed - or estimated by your account - by the Timbervati leopard project. Remember? Thats the lion in question.
 

 



Nice to see you showing your true self.
Once again, there is only 1 pockets.
2ndly,
That lion was 100% estimated. Hence the numerous emails confirming it and specifically stated it was estimated. 
Reply

United States Pckts Offline
Bigcat Enthusiast
******
#47

(08-22-2014, 07:21 AM)'Pantherinae' Wrote:
Quote:
*This image is copyright of its original author
'tigerluver' pid='4379' dateline='1408642201'
What's the exact source of the 250 kg Private Nature Reserve specimen? Never heard of that one.
 



 

 



Why only show this email Pantherinae?
Why not show all of them?

No worries, Ill post it for all to see.

Here are the others that state the truth
http://www.google.com/search?q=250kg+lio...B467%3B246

and the credintiels of the girl who is pictured with it and cared to it
http://www.google.com/search?q=250kg+lio...B467%3B246

Here is a 30 plus page debating this nonsense

http://animalsversesanimals.yuku.com/top..._oikSgSo20

This lion would never be used because it is obviously estimated. 
And it has nothing to do with L vs T, it has to do with accuracy. 
I have no problem with the 240kg (estimated) lion, its accurate and proven.
This one is proven not to be accurate. That is fact.
1 user Likes Pckts's post
Reply

Roflcopters Offline
Modern Tiger Expert
*****
#48

Not going to lie, I trolled Boldchamp hard with this lion but in all honesty. the weight was real from my inquiries as well.

 
1 user Likes Roflcopters's post
Reply

United States Pckts Offline
Bigcat Enthusiast
******
#49
( This post was last modified: 08-25-2014, 01:27 AM by Pckts )

Ok, if you are stating it was weighed then I will take you at your word.
What is the info on christine then? Did she actually write the emails?
If she did then I will have to disagree on this. But if they are forged, I will agree that it was weighed and verified.
Reply

chaos Offline
wildlife enthusiast
***
#50

(08-24-2014, 10:48 PM)'Pckts' Wrote: Ok, if you are stating it was weighed then I will take you at your word.
What is the info on christine then? Did she actually write the emails?
If she did then I will have to disagree on this. But if they are forged, I will agree that it was weighed and verified.

 


It simply breaks down to what you WANT to believe.
Reply

chaos Offline
wildlife enthusiast
***
#51

(08-24-2014, 10:33 PM)'Pckts' Wrote:
(08-22-2014, 06:25 AM)'chaos' Wrote:
(08-21-2014, 10:30 PM)'tigerluver' Wrote: What's the exact source of the 250 kg Private Nature Reserve specimen? Never heard of that one.



 


Ahhhh come on now Pockets. You and I have locked horns on this very topic many times. The 283 kg - stomach content included - lion
weighed - or estimated by your account - by the Timbervati leopard project. Remember? Thats the lion in question.
 


 



Nice to see you showing your true self.
Once again, there is only 1 pockets.
2ndly,
That lion was 100% estimated. Hence the numerous emails confirming it and specifically stated it was estimated. 

 


It was also 100% weighed, hence the numerous emails confiming it was weighed. Still detect obvious bitterness
in your replies to me.  You really need to put it to rest. Fair enough?
 
Reply

chaos Offline
wildlife enthusiast
***
#52

(08-24-2014, 10:38 PM)'Pckts' Wrote:
(08-22-2014, 07:21 AM)'Pantherinae' Wrote:
Quote:
*This image is copyright of its original author
'tigerluver' pid='4379' dateline='1408642201'
What's the exact source of the 250 kg Private Nature Reserve specimen? Never heard of that one.
 



 


 



Why only show this email Pantherinae?
Why not show all of them?

No worries, Ill post it for all to see.

Here are the others that state the truth
http://www.google.com/search?q=250kg+lio...B467%3B246

and the credintiels of the girl who is pictured with it and cared to it
http://www.google.com/search?q=250kg+lio...B467%3B246

Here is a 30 plus page debating this nonsense

http://animalsversesanimals.yuku.com/top..._oikSgSo20

This lion would never be used because it is obviously estimated. 
And it has nothing to do with L vs T, it has to do with accuracy. 
I have no problem with the 240kg (estimated) lion, its accurate and proven.
This one is proven not to be accurate. That is fact.

 
 Note the emphasis on the phrase "WAS weighed". "Was" is capitalized and underlined. Leaving little to the imagination.
I'll leave this for doubters like yourself to ponder.
Reply

Israel Amnon242 Offline
Tiger Enthusiast
****
#53
( This post was last modified: 08-25-2014, 06:03 PM by Amnon242 )

(08-24-2014, 10:48 PM)Pckts Wrote: Ok, if you are stating it was weighed then I will take you at your word.
What is the info on christine then? Did she actually write the emails?
If she did then I will have to disagree on this. But if they are forged, I will agree that it was weighed and verified.

...I remember that discussion on AVA...all I could do was to laugh. Because both sides - tiger fanatics and lion fanatics spent enormous amount of time in absurd discussions in order to prove whether some lion was/was not weighted...

It seems that the lion was weighted. And even if not - what does it mean? Ok he would be not exactly 250/253 kg, but perhaps some kgs less or more...why is it so important?  
Reply

chaos Offline
wildlife enthusiast
***
#54

It was a rather heated topic, but yes I do agree, its not that important.
A crying shame this big cat may have been shot and killed.
1 user Likes chaos's post
Reply

Israel Amnon242 Offline
Tiger Enthusiast
****
#55
( This post was last modified: 08-25-2014, 06:07 PM by Amnon242 )

(08-25-2014, 05:10 PM)chaos Wrote: It was a rather heated topic, but yes I do agree, its not that important.
A crying shame this big cat may have been shot and killed.

This shows the absurdity of TvsL discussions. Fanatics are arguing on the internet...while the cat has been shot...
 
2 users Like Amnon242's post
Reply

chaos Offline
wildlife enthusiast
***
#56

Amen to that!
 
1 user Likes chaos's post
Reply

GuateGojira Offline
Expert & Researcher
*****
#57
( This post was last modified: 08-25-2014, 07:53 PM by GuateGojira )

(08-25-2014, 04:35 PM)'Amnon242' Wrote: ...I remember that discussion on AVA...all I could do was to laugh. Because both sides - tiger fanatics and lion fanatics spent enormous amount of time in absurd discussions in order to prove whether some lion was/was not weighted...

It seems that the lion was weighted. And even if not - what does it mean? Ok he would be not exactly 250/253 kg, but perhaps some kgs less or more...why is it so important?  

 
In fact, the problem was not the 250/253 estimation, it was the 280 kg figure, THAT was the problem.

However, like I stated before, the estimation could be, in fact, between 247-253 kg, if we take in count the fact that male lions gorge themselves up to 33 kg or more (Schaller, 1972). However, the round number of 250 kg is simple a good guess, as even the figure of 280 kg could be wrong, depending of the scale used. From my part, the figure of 250 kg should stand, what we need now are body measurements.

I remember the case of the lions in the Crater, where the team itself stated that the scale used was old and inaccurate. Same happen with other tigers in India, for example the +200 kg male from Pench, which simply bottomed the scale of 200 kg used. They don't even bother themselves in buy a new or larger scale, or simple they don't have the money, which is also a reality in those areas.

These cases are sad because scientists lost the opportunity to get invaluable data from this animals.

Other thing, it is tragic to know that this amazing male was killed. I did not know it until now.
1 user Likes GuateGojira's post
Reply

sanjay Offline
Co-owner of Wildfact
*****
#58

(08-25-2014, 04:35 PM)Amnon242 Wrote: ...I remember that discussion on AVA...all I could do was to laugh. Because both sides - tiger fanatics and lion fanatics spent enormous amount of time in absurd discussions in order to prove whether some lion was/was not weighted... 

It seems that the lion was weighted. And even if not - what does it mean? Ok he would be not exactly 250/253 kg, but perhaps some kgs less or more...why is it so important?   
Can't say better than this.
 
Reply

Australia Richardrli Online
Wildanimal Enthusiast
***
#59
( This post was last modified: 08-25-2014, 09:41 PM by Richardrli )

1. The email response when I contacted Timbavati headquarters about this lion back in August 2012 was that when it was weighed the figure was 281 kg, suggesting that it's a precise figure and not an estimate.

2. They said that the lion had eaten recently and that on an empty stomach he was around 253kg. I agree that this is a bit too precise (i.e too good) to be 100% accurate but considering that it was a vet that made the estimate I trusted his opinion. Keep in mind that this lion could have been 255kg or even 260kg because he most likely would have digested a portion of that previous meal.

3. There's no reason to suspect that the scale used was inaccurate. After all, a vet would make sure the equipment is functioning properly and for all we know it could well have been a digital scale.
2 users Like Richardrli's post
Reply

United States Pckts Offline
Bigcat Enthusiast
******
#60

This was why it was so heated

*This image is copyright of its original author


*This image is copyright of its original author



*This image is copyright of its original author



As you can see, no scale is present and the women pictured is the one who said that he was estimated.
I don't care either way at this point, but if the email is real and the images are as well, I would believe it to be estimated.
Also the fact that scales don't weigh past 200 kg usually and 250kg seem to be the max, its weight would have to been estimated, At least noted. Since this would be the largest verified Lion weighed, I would like real clarification before figuring it.

If copters has more info on the email from christine, I'm sure that would clarify it more.
Reply






Users browsing this thread:
18 Guest(s)

About Us
Go Social     Subscribe  

Welcome to WILDFACT forum, a website that focuses on sharing the joy that wildlife has on offer. We welcome all wildlife lovers to join us in sharing that joy. As a member you can share your research, knowledge and experience on animals with the community.
wildfact.com is intended to serve as an online resource for wildlife lovers of all skill levels from beginners to professionals and from all fields that belong to wildlife anyhow. Our focus area is wild animals from all over world. Content generated here will help showcase the work of wildlife experts and lovers to the world. We believe by the help of your informative article and content we will succeed to educate the world, how these beautiful animals are important to survival of all man kind.
Many thanks for visiting wildfact.com. We hope you will keep visiting wildfact regularly and will refer other members who have passion for wildlife.

Forum software by © MyBB