There is a world somewhere between reality and fiction. Although ignored by many, it is very real and so are those living in it. This forum is about the natural world. Here, wild animals will be heard and respected. The forum offers a glimpse into an unknown world as well as a room with a view on the present and the future. Anyone able to speak on behalf of those living in the emerald forest and the deep blue sea is invited to join.
--- Peter Broekhuijsen ---

  • 2 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Largest Living wild lions ?

Pantherinae Offline
Bigcat Enthusiast
*****
#31

'Pckts dateline='' Wrote:
'Pantherinae dateline='' Wrote: Yeah @Pckts I agree with that. It's more common that Lions are under 200 kg, but certanly it's not rare neither. And that's what i ment. Yeah around 250 kg is maximum for the biggest male lions, but I would not be shocked if some okavango Lions would be higher, but that's only based on pure estimate. 


 


it's possible, but it may not be or it may be Okavango Lions. There isn't any data really proving it one way or another. Meaurements from most areas seem to have high and low weights. Kruger had the highest weighed Lion from one study while only being the 3rd highest weighing lion population. But if a lion can weigh 240kg (adjusted) than I see no reason why there are not other lions that might be larger.
Like the old saying goes,
"theres always a bigger fish in the sea"

 

 

Could not have said it any better myself! There's also a lion on 253 kg adjusted. So big cats can be huge! A cat at over 220 kg is just a beast we can only imagen The strength of. 


 
Reply

Israel Amnon242 Offline
Tiger Enthusiast
****
#32
( This post was last modified: 08-21-2014, 11:23 AM by Amnon242 )

(08-21-2014, 02:26 AM)Pantherinae Wrote: Yeah @Pckts I agree with that. It's more common that Lions are under 200 kg, but certanly it's not rare neither. And that's what i ment. Yeah around 250 kg is maximum for the biggest male lions, but I would not be shocked if some okavango Lions would be higher, but that's only based on pure estimate. 

What do you mean by "rare"?

 
Reply

Guatemala GuateGojira Offline
Expert & Researcher
*****
#33

Here is a little list that I made some time ago:

*This image is copyright of its original author


Hope this helps to enlarge our data. [img]images/smilies/smile.gif[/img]
 
8 users Like GuateGojira's post
Reply

Pantherinae Offline
Bigcat Enthusiast
*****
#34

@GuateGojira thanks! 

Thats awsome!
Reply

Pantherinae Offline
Bigcat Enthusiast
*****
#35

'Amnon242 dateline='' Wrote:
'Pantherinae dateline='' Wrote: Yeah @Pckts I agree with that. It's more common that Lions are under 200 kg, but certanly it's not rare neither. And that's what i ment. Yeah around 250 kg is maximum for the biggest male lions, but I would not be shocked if some okavango Lions would be higher, but that's only based on pure estimate. 

 

What do you mean by "rare"?

 

 

That even if it's not as common as not, it's still no shocker if You find male Lions over 200 kg. 

 
Reply

Israel Amnon242 Offline
Tiger Enthusiast
****
#36
( This post was last modified: 08-21-2014, 08:14 PM by Amnon242 )

(08-21-2014, 05:03 PM)Pantherinae Wrote: That even if it's not as common as not, it's still no shocker if You find male Lions over 200 kg.

I asked so because V. Mazak wrote something slightly different...but it´s just an unimportant game with words. I think we all have basically the same opinion...

BTW yesterday I saw a lion in a zoo, who could be around 200 kg (my estimate).
Reply

United States Pckts Offline
Bigcat Enthusiast
******
#37

Look how close the max for lions is, all over. You really don't see a very dramatic change across the board.
Makes me wonder if tigers follow the same rule.
There are just so many places that have yet to researched and we can only go off a small sample size, a part of me thinks that all areas north and south have monster of their species that hit the max for each cat, or very close.
Reply

tigerluver Offline
Prehistoric Feline Expert
*****
Moderators
#38

What's the exact source of the 250 kg Private Nature Reserve specimen? Never heard of that one.
Reply

chaos Offline
wildlife enthusiast
***
#39

(08-21-2014, 10:30 PM)'tigerluver' Wrote: What's the exact source of the 250 kg Private Nature Reserve specimen? Never heard of that one.

 


Ahhhh come on now Pockets. You and I have locked horns on this very topic many times. The 283 kg - stomach content included - lion
weighed - or estimated by your account - by the Timbervati leopard project. Remember? Thats the lion in question.
 
Reply

tigerluver Offline
Prehistoric Feline Expert
*****
Moderators
#40

Thanks for the info, but I'm not Pckts. Just wondering where it's mentioned for my records.
Reply

Pantherinae Offline
Bigcat Enthusiast
*****
#41

Quote:
*This image is copyright of its original author
'tigerluver' pid='4379' dateline='1408642201'
What's the exact source of the 250 kg Private Nature Reserve specimen? Never heard of that one.
 



 
1 user Likes Pantherinae's post
Reply

chaos Offline
wildlife enthusiast
***
#42

(08-22-2014, 07:07 AM)'tigerluver' Wrote: Thanks for the info, but I'm not Pckts. Just wondering where it's mentioned for my records.

 

My bad. Sorry 

 
Reply

Guatemala GuateGojira Offline
Expert & Researcher
*****
#43

More data on the 250 kg lion:


*This image is copyright of its original author

As we can see, both emails use a round number of about 250 kg and the lion was with a full stomach. The figure of 253 kg is as reliable as a figure of 247 kg, if we take in count a food intake of 33 kg, which is also plausible.

In fact, the largest food intake reported by Schaller was of 33 kg (East Africa), the largest from South Africa was of 35 kg (Apps, 2000), and Packer mention a higher figure of 43 kg from Tanzania. In this case, the weight of this lion could be as low as 237 kg, but the vets estimated that the food intake of this lions was probably about 30 kg, which seems normal for a gorged lion, so the correct figure should be 250 kg empty, which is the one quoted by Almero Bosch. In this cases, round numbers from "estimated values" are the correct ones.

Using this, I think that the correct source that most be quoted for this record male lion should be "Bosch, Pers. Comm. 2013". I will change that in the image.
 
5 users Like GuateGojira's post
Reply

United States TheLioness Offline
Bigcat Enthusiast
***
#44

What a lion I bet.
Reply

Australia Richardrli Offline
Wildanimal Enthusiast
***
#45

Unfortunately this magnificent male was shot last year. Just trying to find the link at the moment.
 
1 user Likes Richardrli's post
Reply






Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

About Us
Go Social     Subscribe  

Welcome to WILDFACT forum, a website that focuses on sharing the joy that wildlife has on offer. We welcome all wildlife lovers to join us in sharing that joy. As a member you can share your research, knowledge and experience on animals with the community.
wildfact.com is intended to serve as an online resource for wildlife lovers of all skill levels from beginners to professionals and from all fields that belong to wildlife anyhow. Our focus area is wild animals from all over world. Content generated here will help showcase the work of wildlife experts and lovers to the world. We believe by the help of your informative article and content we will succeed to educate the world, how these beautiful animals are important to survival of all man kind.
Many thanks for visiting wildfact.com. We hope you will keep visiting wildfact regularly and will refer other members who have passion for wildlife.

Forum software by © MyBB