There is a world somewhere between reality and fiction. Although ignored by many, it is very real and so are those living in it. This forum is about the natural world. Here, wild animals will be heard and respected. The forum offers a glimpse into an unknown world as well as a room with a view on the present and the future. Anyone able to speak on behalf of those living in the emerald forest and the deep blue sea is invited to join.
--- Peter Broekhuijsen ---

  • 3 Vote(s) - 4.33 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Freak Felids - A Discussion of History's Largest Felines

United States tigerluver Offline
Feline Expert
*****
Moderators

Remember the genetic studies that group the South China tiger pretty much on its own and the study (I forget the name) that mentioned that this species is likely the stem group? Maybe that is why the canine fit better. 

Insular dwarfism probably had to have affected skull morphology to some degree. I wonder have fast the downsizing occurred. Sea levels were still quite low 20 kya (Source and read this source for maps, look at the 120 m and 105 m contour maps). As an analogy, I've read of a dwarf Stegodon of Indonesia that evolved from a larger version 840 kya went extinct around 12 kya, but sea level-wise, dwarf pressures due to spatial limitation shouldn't have occurred until 20 kya. I'm reading up on the potential prey fauna to get clues on how fast the changes may have occurred. This is the reading.

I noticed the drawings of Javan tiger skulls differ a bit from the actual photos I've seen. I wonder if the misfit is just intraspecific variation.
1 user Likes tigerluver's post
Reply

Singapore Fieryeel Offline
Member
**

(09-19-2015, 12:23 AM)tigerluver Wrote: @GuateGojira, so would you need the images in vK's book?

I think we can interchange lower and upper canines in photographic overlays easily. Nevertheless, I'm still leaning toward the canines we have been investigating to be lower canines due to the colorations which would show the boundary of the gums. The tapering of the canines at the end also is another piece of evidence to this conclusion in my opinion (I looked through Merriam and Stock and the canine/claws thread and this trend is quite consistent), as stated before. Finally, the lower canines look relatively thinner compared to their height. 

@Fieryeel, would you mind if I cited your canine in my appendix for my studies (I'd cite it as private collection)?

Go ahead.

Are you doing a paper for a degree?
2 users Like Fieryeel's post
Reply

United States tigerluver Offline
Feline Expert
*****
Moderators

@Fieryeel, not for a dissertation, just personal interests with my academic group, one could say. I wish it was a dissertation, I'd actually have time to work on it during the semester.
3 users Like tigerluver's post
Reply

United States GrizzlyClaws Offline
Canine Expert
*****
Moderators

(09-19-2015, 05:39 AM)tigerluver Wrote: Remember the genetic studies that group the South China tiger pretty much on its own and the study (I forget the name) that mentioned that this species is likely the stem group? Maybe that is why the canine fit better. 

Insular dwarfism probably had to have affected skull morphology to some degree. I wonder have fast the downsizing occurred. Sea levels were still quite low 20 kya (Source and read this source for maps, look at the 120 m and 105 m contour maps). As an analogy, I've read of a dwarf Stegodon of Indonesia that evolved from a larger version 840 kya went extinct around 12 kya, but sea level-wise, dwarf pressures due to spatial limitation shouldn't have occurred until 20 kya. I'm reading up on the potential prey fauna to get clues on how fast the changes may have occurred. This is the reading.

I noticed the drawings of Javan tiger skulls differ a bit from the actual photos I've seen. I wonder if the misfit is just intraspecific variation.

The end of the last glacial period was around 10,500 BC, that's why the sea level was still low until 12 kya.

Maybe insular dwarfism of the Sunda tiger could have been occurred quite late until the end of the Pleistocene era, and there could have few Ngandong tigers that had survived from the Toba Eruption and finally went into the dwarfism process until 12 kya.
1 user Likes GrizzlyClaws's post
Reply

United States GrizzlyClaws Offline
Canine Expert
*****
Moderators

New Amur tiger's subfossil from Manchuria.


*This image is copyright of its original author



*This image is copyright of its original author
2 users Like GrizzlyClaws's post
Reply

United States tigerluver Offline
Feline Expert
*****
Moderators

@GrizzlyClaws, could you post all the subfossils you know of, as well as their locality all in one post?
2 users Like tigerluver's post
Reply

United States GrizzlyClaws Offline
Canine Expert
*****
Moderators

I only know the exact location of two Manchurian subfossils.

This one is from Heilongjiang.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heilongjiang


*This image is copyright of its original author



*This image is copyright of its original author




This one is from Liaoning.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liaoning


*This image is copyright of its original author
1 user Likes GrizzlyClaws's post
Reply

United States GrizzlyClaws Offline
Canine Expert
*****
Moderators

I guess all those black colored subfossils were from Heilongjiang, because of the Chernozem belt.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernozem
1 user Likes GrizzlyClaws's post
Reply

genao87 Offline
Member
**

That new fossil giant was the AMUR???  So it is safe to say that it was the largest modern cat and possibly rival the two Prehistoric Tigers?
1 user Likes genao87's post
Reply

United States GrizzlyClaws Offline
Canine Expert
*****
Moderators
( This post was last modified: 09-25-2015, 04:12 AM by GrizzlyClaws )

The subfossil of the Amur tiger is abundant in Manchuria, and we can only assume that they have very large canine teeth.

BTW, I am hoping @tigerluver to reconstruct the skull for both Wanhsien tiger (formerly known as the Woolly tiger or Cave tiger) and Ngandong tiger with the new fossil evidence.
Reply

United States tigerluver Offline
Feline Expert
*****
Moderators
( This post was last modified: 09-25-2015, 05:13 AM by tigerluver )

I don't think we've met @genao87, so nice to meet you.

A rough stretch just ended for me, so I'm not ignoring any requests on purpose. I really do appreciate everyone who discusses in this topic.

Could you please give me detailed instructions on what exactly you guys are looking for, including which fossils and what type of reconstruction (drawing, measurements)?
1 user Likes tigerluver's post
Reply

United States GrizzlyClaws Offline
Canine Expert
*****
Moderators

After fitting the canine into the mandible, what is your approximate length for the mandible and skull?
1 user Likes GrizzlyClaws's post
Reply

Singapore Fieryeel Offline
Member
**

One more tooth has arrived from Java.

It measures 9.7 cm long, and is 47 grams. Looks and feels like a mini version of my other tooth. Any ideas?


*This image is copyright of its original author


*This image is copyright of its original author


*This image is copyright of its original author
3 users Like Fieryeel's post
Reply

United States GrizzlyClaws Offline
Canine Expert
*****
Moderators

It looks quite odd, but consider that the fossils of the Javan tigers are more fossilized than others', hence it explains the deformed shape.
1 user Likes GrizzlyClaws's post
Reply

United States tigerluver Offline
Feline Expert
*****
Moderators

Don't quote me on anything yet, but from the four fittings, @Fieryeel's tooth I get a GSL of 480 mm and ML of 320 mm (Ngandong mandible, the best match we concluded), GSL = 450 mm and ML=293 mm (Longdang tiger), and GSL = 385 mm and ML = 256 mm (Trinil mandible). The Trinil mandibles have really thick canines, the length/height ratio of those is about 0.30, while @Fieryeel's tooth is 0.23 and one we found as a best match about 0.225 as well.


That second fossil looks cat-like as well to me. What is the greatest length on the tooth from the side? That could again be a clue to confirming its owner's identity.

The fossilization pattern looks similar to the one found on P. youngi: 

*This image is copyright of its original author
1 user Likes tigerluver's post
Reply






Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

About Us
Go Social     Subscribe  

Welcome to WILDFACT forum, a website that focuses on sharing the joy that wildlife has on offer. We welcome all wildlife lovers to join us in sharing that joy. As a member you can share your research, knowledge and experience on animals with the community.
wildfact.com is intended to serve as an online resource for wildlife lovers of all skill levels from beginners to professionals and from all fields that belong to wildlife anyhow. Our focus area is wild animals from all over world. Content generated here will help showcase the work of wildlife experts and lovers to the world. We believe by the help of your informative article and content we will succeed to educate the world, how these beautiful animals are important to survival of all man kind.
Many thanks for visiting wildfact.com. We hope you will keep visiting wildfact regularly and will refer other members who have passion for wildlife.

Forum software by © MyBB