There is a world somewhere between reality and fiction. Although ignored by many, it is very real and so are those living in it. This forum is about the natural world. Here, wild animals will be heard and respected. The forum offers a glimpse into an unknown world as well as a room with a view on the present and the future. Anyone able to speak on behalf of those living in the emerald forest and the deep blue sea is invited to join.
--- Peter Broekhuijsen ---

  • 2 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Modern weights and measurements on wild tigers

abhisingh7 Offline
Regular Member
***

(11-04-2022, 02:54 AM)Pckts Wrote:
(11-04-2022, 12:39 AM)abhisingh7 Wrote:
(11-03-2022, 09:37 PM)Pckts Wrote:
(11-02-2022, 08:02 PM)abhisingh7 Wrote:
(11-02-2022, 07:32 PM)Pckts Wrote:
(11-02-2022, 10:43 AM)abhisingh7 Wrote:
(11-02-2022, 02:39 AM)Pckts Wrote:
(11-02-2022, 02:34 AM)abhisingh7 Wrote:
(10-31-2022, 08:55 PM)Pckts Wrote:
(10-31-2022, 07:39 PM)abhisingh7 Wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcoSrVVnDNE , its on video , weighted 230kg after medical check up . https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city...905866.cms ,  they might release the report in public too .

It's the same as the article, both published by TOI. It's just the article "made for tv" version.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umNnz0nl2ns see this .

"Video clip" anonymous
This is a reporter relaying the same story. 
DB Tech and Travel has nothing to do with the capture.
You need verifiable sources who actually participated in the capture and alleged measuring. Forest Department, Vet, Capture team, etc.

lol , looks like alok pathak is not on social media , okk you should visit satpura to see it , if its bigger than matka then its 230kg .
Pathak never stated his size, did he? 
You’re confusing the article with actual quotes from a person. 
And why would you think Matka is close to that size?

naah i don't think they will quote a fake figure its most likely forest team  told them , 230kg is possible  and not a very high figure , if girth is 134-136cm then it must be like that ,even if it ate the bait goat then it would be like 220-223 kg empty . on hotstar there is a documentary on matka  in which it being said matka is a 500lbs tiger . thats a estimate ,i think matka could be 220 becoz he is bigger than gabbar ,see both gabbar and matka with maya . gabbar weighted 185kg in summer in bad shape , in peak condition gabbar must be like 200-210kg .

Of course they do, they do it all the time. TOI is known to do that. 
Again, quoting media outlets estimates mean nothing. Matka is small, who knows if he was bigger than Gabbar or not, but regardless he's a small male. The idea that Gabbar must be 200-210 isn't factual, he was weighed in a healthy condition and his weight was his weight.
well if u see both gabbar and matka with maaya u would know this , matka is noticebly bigger .its not rocket science here , people can easily found it  there are videos of gabbar and matka with maya . gabbar was collared after he fought matka and in summer . here is gabbar immediately few days after collaring

These are baseless claims. Would you say Matka was larger than Katezari or Saturn, Matkasurs father?
Because Gabbar fought both and was close in size to both. Gabbar was also a more muscular Tiger in comparison. Matka is small, he’s not big framed but he was bulky in his prime. He’s not going to dwarf Gabbar by any stretch. Gabbar also gave Matka his busted nose when they used to call Matkasur, Pandu. Gabbar mated with Maya after his win. 

I’m regards to your claim that 220kg is easily obtained by a male Tiger, that’s not the case. If you’re talking about Empty then that’s really not the case. And with Matkasurs small stature I’d say it’s very likely he was around 200kg at best, especially without a full belly.

matka beat him back  , gabbar never came back again.
2 users Like abhisingh7's post
Reply

Roflcopters Offline
Modern Tiger Expert
*****

(11-04-2022, 10:26 AM)abhisingh7 Wrote:
(11-04-2022, 02:54 AM)Pckts Wrote:
(11-04-2022, 12:39 AM)abhisingh7 Wrote:
(11-03-2022, 09:37 PM)Pckts Wrote:
(11-02-2022, 08:02 PM)abhisingh7 Wrote:
(11-02-2022, 07:32 PM)Pckts Wrote:
(11-02-2022, 10:43 AM)abhisingh7 Wrote:
(11-02-2022, 02:39 AM)Pckts Wrote:
(11-02-2022, 02:34 AM)abhisingh7 Wrote:
(10-31-2022, 08:55 PM)Pckts Wrote: It's the same as the article, both published by TOI. It's just the article "made for tv" version.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umNnz0nl2ns see this .

"Video clip" anonymous
This is a reporter relaying the same story. 
DB Tech and Travel has nothing to do with the capture.
You need verifiable sources who actually participated in the capture and alleged measuring. Forest Department, Vet, Capture team, etc.

lol , looks like alok pathak is not on social media , okk you should visit satpura to see it , if its bigger than matka then its 230kg .
Pathak never stated his size, did he? 
You’re confusing the article with actual quotes from a person. 
And why would you think Matka is close to that size?

naah i don't think they will quote a fake figure its most likely forest team  told them , 230kg is possible  and not a very high figure , if girth is 134-136cm then it must be like that ,even if it ate the bait goat then it would be like 220-223 kg empty . on hotstar there is a documentary on matka  in which it being said matka is a 500lbs tiger . thats a estimate ,i think matka could be 220 becoz he is bigger than gabbar ,see both gabbar and matka with maya . gabbar weighted 185kg in summer in bad shape , in peak condition gabbar must be like 200-210kg .

Of course they do, they do it all the time. TOI is known to do that. 
Again, quoting media outlets estimates mean nothing. Matka is small, who knows if he was bigger than Gabbar or not, but regardless he's a small male. The idea that Gabbar must be 200-210 isn't factual, he was weighed in a healthy condition and his weight was his weight.
well if u see both gabbar and matka with maaya u would know this , matka is noticebly bigger .its not rocket science here , people can easily found it  there are videos of gabbar and matka with maya . gabbar was collared after he fought matka and in summer . here is gabbar immediately few days after collaring

These are baseless claims. Would you say Matka was larger than Katezari or Saturn, Matkasurs father?
Because Gabbar fought both and was close in size to both. Gabbar was also a more muscular Tiger in comparison. Matka is small, he’s not big framed but he was bulky in his prime. He’s not going to dwarf Gabbar by any stretch. Gabbar also gave Matka his busted nose when they used to call Matkasur, Pandu. Gabbar mated with Maya after his win. 

I’m regards to your claim that 220kg is easily obtained by a male Tiger, that’s not the case. If you’re talking about Empty then that’s really not the case. And with Matkasurs small stature I’d say it’s very likely he was around 200kg at best, especially without a full belly.

matka beat him back  , gabbar never came back again.

they had 3 prominent rounds with each other, Matkasur originally took charge from him. Summer 2016, Gabbar came back and won round 2 but he lasted until Aug 2016 and was defeated for good. he was never seen again after this. Matkasur later went on to rule all of the former areas previously ruled by Namdev, Katezari and Gabbar.
3 users Like Roflcopters's post
Reply

abhisingh7 Offline
Regular Member
***
( This post was last modified: 11-04-2022, 02:37 PM by abhisingh7 )

(11-04-2022, 10:37 AM)Roflcopters Wrote:
(11-04-2022, 10:26 AM)abhisingh7 Wrote:
(11-04-2022, 02:54 AM)Pckts Wrote:
(11-04-2022, 12:39 AM)abhisingh7 Wrote:
(11-03-2022, 09:37 PM)Pckts Wrote:
(11-02-2022, 08:02 PM)abhisingh7 Wrote:
(11-02-2022, 07:32 PM)Pckts Wrote:
(11-02-2022, 10:43 AM)abhisingh7 Wrote:
(11-02-2022, 02:39 AM)Pckts Wrote:
(11-02-2022, 02:34 AM)abhisingh7 Wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umNnz0nl2ns see this .

"Video clip" anonymous
This is a reporter relaying the same story. 
DB Tech and Travel has nothing to do with the capture.
You need verifiable sources who actually participated in the capture and alleged measuring. Forest Department, Vet, Capture team, etc.

lol , looks like alok pathak is not on social media , okk you should visit satpura to see it , if its bigger than matka then its 230kg .
Pathak never stated his size, did he? 
You’re confusing the article with actual quotes from a person. 
And why would you think Matka is close to that size?

naah i don't think they will quote a fake figure its most likely forest team  told them , 230kg is possible  and not a very high figure , if girth is 134-136cm then it must be like that ,even if it ate the bait goat then it would be like 220-223 kg empty . on hotstar there is a documentary on matka  in which it being said matka is a 500lbs tiger . thats a estimate ,i think matka could be 220 becoz he is bigger than gabbar ,see both gabbar and matka with maya . gabbar weighted 185kg in summer in bad shape , in peak condition gabbar must be like 200-210kg .

Of course they do, they do it all the time. TOI is known to do that. 
Again, quoting media outlets estimates mean nothing. Matka is small, who knows if he was bigger than Gabbar or not, but regardless he's a small male. The idea that Gabbar must be 200-210 isn't factual, he was weighed in a healthy condition and his weight was his weight.
well if u see both gabbar and matka with maaya u would know this , matka is noticebly bigger .its not rocket science here , people can easily found it  there are videos of gabbar and matka with maya . gabbar was collared after he fought matka and in summer . here is gabbar immediately few days after collaring

These are baseless claims. Would you say Matka was larger than Katezari or Saturn, Matkasurs father?
Because Gabbar fought both and was close in size to both. Gabbar was also a more muscular Tiger in comparison. Matka is small, he’s not big framed but he was bulky in his prime. He’s not going to dwarf Gabbar by any stretch. Gabbar also gave Matka his busted nose when they used to call Matkasur, Pandu. Gabbar mated with Maya after his win. 

I’m regards to your claim that 220kg is easily obtained by a male Tiger, that’s not the case. If you’re talking about Empty then that’s really not the case. And with Matkasurs small stature I’d say it’s very likely he was around 200kg at best, especially without a full belly.

matka beat him back  , gabbar never came back again.

they had 3 prominent rounds with each other, Matkasur originally took charge from him. Summer 2016, Gabbar came back and won round 2 but he lasted until Aug 2016 and was defeated for good. he was never seen again after this. Matkasur later went on to rule all of the former areas previously ruled by Namdev, Katezari and Gabbar.

also t120  has fought t101 and pushed him but got injured and is said to be treated by  ranthambhore authorities around 4-6 months ago .
2 users Like abhisingh7's post
Reply

India Jerricson Offline
Prometheus
**

Hope this clears the confusion regarding body mass of the male recently shifted to Satpura TR. Looks like TOI even quoted the estimated weight wrong in their article.



*This image is copyright of its original author
4 users Like Jerricson's post
Reply

Roflcopters Offline
Modern Tiger Expert
*****
( This post was last modified: 11-06-2022, 01:21 PM by Roflcopters )

(11-06-2022, 11:44 AM)Jerricson Wrote: Hope this clears the confusion regarding body mass of the male recently shifted to Satpura TR. Looks like TOI even quoted the estimated weight wrong in their article.



*This image is copyright of its original author

thanks @Jerricson 

any idea how old this male was?
Reply

United States Pckts Offline
Bigcat Enthusiast
******

(11-06-2022, 11:44 AM)Jerricson Wrote: Hope this clears the confusion regarding body mass of the male recently shifted to Satpura TR. Looks like TOI even quoted the estimated weight wrong in their article.



*This image is copyright of its original author

Like I said, never use TOI as a source. Thanks for confirming.
Reply

LonePredator Offline
Regular Member
***

(11-06-2022, 04:48 PM)Pckts Wrote:
(11-06-2022, 11:44 AM)Jerricson Wrote: Hope this clears the confusion regarding body mass of the male recently shifted to Satpura TR. Looks like TOI even quoted the estimated weight wrong in their article.



*This image is copyright of its original author

Like I said, never use TOI as a source. Thanks for confirming.

Not just TOI but any news article in general.
1 user Likes LonePredator's post
Reply

United States Pckts Offline
Bigcat Enthusiast
******

(11-06-2022, 05:00 PM)LonePredator Wrote:
(11-06-2022, 04:48 PM)Pckts Wrote:
(11-06-2022, 11:44 AM)Jerricson Wrote: Hope this clears the confusion regarding body mass of the male recently shifted to Satpura TR. Looks like TOI even quoted the estimated weight wrong in their article.



*This image is copyright of its original author

Like I said, never use TOI as a source. Thanks for confirming.

Not just TOI but any news article in general.
For the most part, yes unless the article directly quotes someone who took part in the actual capture.
Reply

abhisingh7 Offline
Regular Member
***

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEFpuzY8yjY
Reply

United States Pckts Offline
Bigcat Enthusiast
******


*This image is copyright of its original author


*This image is copyright of its original author


*This image is copyright of its original author


*This image is copyright of its original author
2 users Like Pckts's post
Reply

abhisingh7 Offline
Regular Member
***
( This post was last modified: 12-11-2022, 08:04 PM by abhisingh7 )

@GuateGojira hi guate just seen this 288kg tiger data ,its overall height is 130cm and paw length is 20cm , so is its height 110 cm in straight line , and paw width is given 18cm , whats the biggest paw ever measured in case of a tiger ?

Attached Files Image(s)
   
2 users Like abhisingh7's post
Reply

United States Pckts Offline
Bigcat Enthusiast
******

(12-11-2022, 08:03 PM)abhisingh7 Wrote: @GuateGojira hi guate just seen this 288kg tiger data ,its overall height is 130cm and paw length is 20cm , so is its height 110 cm in straight line , and paw width is given 18cm , whats the biggest paw ever measured in case of a tiger ?

20cm is the upper limit of paw size. A male in Kanha named Saddam had a 20cm paw.

Do you know where this data came from?
Reply

Ashutosh Offline
Contributor
*****

@Pckts @abhisingh7 888 male’s paw size from Melghat measured at over 18 cm. I think hairyfoot most likely exceeded 19 cm while the Rajaji male definitely had paw prints over 20 cm.
1 user Likes Ashutosh's post
Reply

United States Pckts Offline
Bigcat Enthusiast
******

(12-11-2022, 08:38 PM)Ashutosh Wrote: @Pckts @abhisingh7 888 male’s paw size from Melghat measured at over 18 cm. I think hairyfoot most likely exceeded 19 cm while the Rajaji male definitely had paw prints over 20 cm.

Yeah, anything over 20cm is exceptional. Although Sadam for having a 20cm pugmark was said to be one of the more modest males. Similar in length to Kankatta but a little more bulky. Still smaller than Banda and Konda by some margin.
Reply

abhisingh7 Offline
Regular Member
***

(12-11-2022, 08:43 PM)Pckts Wrote:
(12-11-2022, 08:38 PM)Ashutosh Wrote: @Pckts @abhisingh7 888 male’s paw size from Melghat measured at over 18 cm. I think hairyfoot most likely exceeded 19 cm while the Rajaji male definitely had paw prints over 20 cm.

Yeah, anything over 20cm is exceptional. Although Sadam for having a 20cm pugmark was said to be one of the more modest males. Similar in length to Kankatta but a little more bulky. Still smaller than Banda and Konda by some margin.

have u got pics of saddam , may be this data is by charger. 20 cm paw width is very large and rare , i want to see that kanha male .
Reply






Users browsing this thread:
7 Guest(s)

About Us
Go Social     Subscribe  

Welcome to WILDFACT forum, a website that focuses on sharing the joy that wildlife has on offer. We welcome all wildlife lovers to join us in sharing that joy. As a member you can share your research, knowledge and experience on animals with the community.
wildfact.com is intended to serve as an online resource for wildlife lovers of all skill levels from beginners to professionals and from all fields that belong to wildlife anyhow. Our focus area is wild animals from all over world. Content generated here will help showcase the work of wildlife experts and lovers to the world. We believe by the help of your informative article and content we will succeed to educate the world, how these beautiful animals are important to survival of all man kind.
Many thanks for visiting wildfact.com. We hope you will keep visiting wildfact regularly and will refer other members who have passion for wildlife.

Forum software by © MyBB