There is a world somewhere between reality and fiction. Although ignored by many, it is very real and so are those living in it. This forum is about the natural world. Here, wild animals will be heard and respected. The forum offers a glimpse into an unknown world as well as a room with a view on the present and the future. Anyone able to speak on behalf of those living in the emerald forest and the deep blue sea is invited to join.
--- Peter Broekhuijsen ---

  • 1 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Size comparisons

JurassicDD Offline
Member
**


*This image is copyright of its original author

North Americas biggest bad lads (Tyrannosaurus vs Acrocanthosaurus diagrams by Franoys
2 users Like JurassicDD's post
Reply

Canada DinoFan83 Offline
Regular Member
***
( This post was last modified: 11-18-2019, 07:18 PM by DinoFan83 )

American mastodon vs Mapusaurus, skeletals by Larramendi and Franoys respectively.
On top is average vs average, with AMNH 9950 for the mastodon and MCF-PVPH-108.202 for Mapusaurus. The mastodon is 2.89 meters shoulder height and 7.8 tonnes, while the Mapusaurus is 12.23 meters axial length and 7 tonnes.
On the bottom is max vs max, with 595BS71 for the mastodon and MCF-PVPH-108.145 for Mapusaurus. The mastodon is 3.25 meters shoulder height and 11 tonnes, while the Mapusaurus is 13.36 meters axial length and 8.5 tonnes.
The scalebars for average vs average are fine to use but I suggest ignoring max vs max scalebars as I scaled up the animals and the scalebars wouldn't match what I scaled to. The size charts are not to scale with one another.

Attached Files Image(s)
   
2 users Like DinoFan83's post
Reply

Canada DinoFan83 Offline
Regular Member
***

Sarkastodon vs Giganotosaurus, skeletals by blaze and Hartman respectively.
AMNH 26641 vs MUCPv-95

Attached Files Image(s)
   
1 user Likes DinoFan83's post
Reply

Canada DinoFan83 Offline
Regular Member
***

Sarkastodon vs Triceratops, max vs max, AMNH 26641 vs UCMP 128561. Skeletal credit goes to blaze and Hartman respectively.
The Sarkastodon is about 200 kg, while the Triceratops is probably around ~14-14.7 tonnes scaling up from BYU 12183 (GDI by SpinoInWonderland)

Attached Files Image(s)
   
1 user Likes DinoFan83's post
Reply

BorneanTiger Offline
Contributor
*****

Female puma against a guanaco about 3 times her weight: https://wildfact.com/forum/topic-camels-...8#pid94838
Reply

Canada DinoFan83 Offline
Regular Member
***
( This post was last modified: 12-24-2019, 07:35 AM by DinoFan83 )

Southern mammoth (Scoppito specimen, ~4 meters shoulder height, 10.7 tonnes) vs Jimbo the Supersaurus (~33 meters TL, 35 tonnes)

Credit to Larramendi and Hartman for the skeletals, scalebar is 1 meter

Read more: http://theworldofanimals.proboards.com/thread/50/size-comparison-scale?page=86#ixzz65ou01nhR


*This image is copyright of its original author
2 users Like DinoFan83's post
Reply

Oman Lycaon Offline
أسد الأطلس
*****
Moderators

@DinoFan83 

Just a recommendation for these post is to crop out the clutter so it looks more clean like this . 


*This image is copyright of its original author
1 user Likes Lycaon's post
Reply

Canada DinoFan83 Offline
Regular Member
***

I'd love to, but I can't. Does Imgur allow image cropping?
Reply

Oman Lycaon Offline
أسد الأطلس
*****
Moderators

@DinoFan83 

Before uplooading to imgur you can crop the image. or alternatively take a screenshot and then crop.
Reply

Canada DinoFan83 Offline
Regular Member
***

Yes, that's what I do. However, I upload them to The World of Animals before screenshotting and uploading to Imgur, and ProBoards doesn't seem to allow for image cropping.

Oh well. Let's see what I can find.
2 users Like DinoFan83's post
Reply

Canada DinoFan83 Offline
Regular Member
***
( This post was last modified: 11-22-2019, 09:11 PM by DinoFan83 )

This may have been posted already but I don't think it was.

Eotriceratops (lower estimate) vs Futalognkosaurus, skeletals by GetAwayTrike and Hartman respectively. Eotriceratops is probably ~10-12 tonnes while Futalognkosaurus is at least 50 tonnes

http://theworldofanimals.proboards.com/t...50?page=84

Attached Files Image(s)
   
1 user Likes DinoFan83's post
Reply

Canada DinoFan83 Offline
Regular Member
***
( This post was last modified: 11-22-2019, 09:11 PM by DinoFan83 )

FMNH PR 2081 (Sue the Tyrannosaurus rex, around or somewhat above 8 tonnes) vs BYU 9024 (Barosaurus, 100 tonnes). Skeletals by Hartman

http://theworldofanimals.proboards.com/t...50?page=84

Attached Files Image(s)
   
1 user Likes DinoFan83's post
Reply

Canada DinoFan83 Offline
Regular Member
***
( This post was last modified: 11-24-2019, 03:25 AM by DinoFan83 )

Triceratops vs Mapusaurus, average vs average on top and max vs max on the bottom. Note: The charts are not to scale with each other and I suggest ignoring the scalebar in max vs max
On top is BYU 12183 (10.5-11 tonnes, scaled to 2.5 meter skull) vs MCF-PVPH-108.202 (7 tonnes, scaled to 148 cm skull)
On the bottom is UCMP 128561 (14-14.7 tonnes, scaled to 2.7 meter skull) vs MCF-PVPH-108.145 (8.5 tonnes, scaled to 161 cm skull)
Credit to Hartman for Trike and Franoys for Mapu
http://theworldofanimals.proboards.com/thread/50

*This image is copyright of its original author
1 user Likes DinoFan83's post
Reply

JurassicDD Offline
Member
**

Tyrannosaurus rex specimen Sue 12.3 meters and 9.7 tons with the Giganotosaurus holotype specimen 12.2 meters 7.5 tons diagrams by Franoys https://www.deviantart.com/franoys

*This image is copyright of its original author
2 users Like JurassicDD's post
Reply

JurassicDD Offline
Member
**

Giganotosaurus specimen MUCP-V95 estimated size with Tyrannosaurus rex Sue
note: the size for Giganotosaurus here is based solely from one jaw fragment and nothing else. Many within the paleo community refuse to use this jaw fragment because it is unreliable for scaling.

*This image is copyright of its original author
 


*This image is copyright of its original author

Diagrams from Scott Hartman

*This image is copyright of its original author
4 users Like JurassicDD's post
Reply






Users browsing this thread:
109 Guest(s)

About Us
Go Social     Subscribe  

Welcome to WILDFACT forum, a website that focuses on sharing the joy that wildlife has on offer. We welcome all wildlife lovers to join us in sharing that joy. As a member you can share your research, knowledge and experience on animals with the community.
wildfact.com is intended to serve as an online resource for wildlife lovers of all skill levels from beginners to professionals and from all fields that belong to wildlife anyhow. Our focus area is wild animals from all over world. Content generated here will help showcase the work of wildlife experts and lovers to the world. We believe by the help of your informative article and content we will succeed to educate the world, how these beautiful animals are important to survival of all man kind.
Many thanks for visiting wildfact.com. We hope you will keep visiting wildfact regularly and will refer other members who have passion for wildlife.

Forum software by © MyBB