There is a world somewhere between reality and fiction. Although ignored by many, it is very real and so are those living in it. This forum is about the natural world. Here, wild animals will be heard and respected. The forum offers a glimpse into an unknown world as well as a room with a view on the present and the future. Anyone able to speak on behalf of those living in the emerald forest and the deep blue sea is invited to join.
--- Peter Broekhuijsen ---

  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
In what groups we can divide the Bengal Tiger?

Suhail Offline
Member
**
#31

Does bengal tigers have bigger cousin at home?
Or new sub species of tiger in india?
This article tells about that.

https://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&source...e4y2Euj74T
2 users Like Suhail's post
Reply

Ashutosh Offline
Contributor
*****
#32
( This post was last modified: 08-12-2019, 09:46 AM by Ashutosh )

   

Well, I was digging up DNA analysis on a couple of tigers and in that report I came across a fascinating bit of information about Bengal Tigers and their sub populations in relation to one another. 

What I found most interesting was the two rescued cubs from Dibang valley were a different subpopulation altogether with closest relatives being Tigers of North East Brahmaputra Floodplains and specifically Manas and Orang tigers (TIG25 haplogroup marker). But these two subpopulations closest relatives were from Western Ghats more specifically, a haplogroup marker TIG2 from Nagarhole. That is very weird indeed!

Also, Nagarhole has three distinct subpopulation markers TIG3, TIG28 and TIG2. While TIG3 and TIG28 are next to each other, TIG2 is the interesting haplogroup marker absolutely throwing a spanner in the works of sorts. While Nagarhole’s neighbouring Bandipur has TIG13, TIG 16 and TIG19 all close together, but an area of about 3000 sq.km in Western Ghats contains six different population markers. That is intriguing.

If I have read the DNA charts wrong, I do apologize.
2 users Like Ashutosh's post
Reply

parvez Offline
Tiger enthusiast
*****
#33
( This post was last modified: 08-12-2019, 12:00 PM by parvez )

Yes @Ashutosh the cubs were proven to be Bengal. 
*This image is copyright of its original author

As I said previously the flow of fresh genes from Indochinese tigers and their indigenisation of those genes during the course of some generations make them highly resistant to gravitational waves and hence they become stockier and heavier at equal shoulder heights.
2 users Like parvez's post
Reply

Rishi Offline
Moderator
*****
Moderators
#34


*This image is copyright of its original author
3 users Like Rishi's post
Reply






Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

About Us
Go Social     Subscribe  

Welcome to WILDFACT forum, a website that focuses on sharing the joy that wildlife has on offer. We welcome all wildlife lovers to join us in sharing that joy. As a member you can share your research, knowledge and experience on animals with the community.
wildfact.com is intended to serve as an online resource for wildlife lovers of all skill levels from beginners to professionals and from all fields that belong to wildlife anyhow. Our focus area is wild animals from all over world. Content generated here will help showcase the work of wildlife experts and lovers to the world. We believe by the help of your informative article and content we will succeed to educate the world, how these beautiful animals are important to survival of all man kind.
Many thanks for visiting wildfact.com. We hope you will keep visiting wildfact regularly and will refer other members who have passion for wildlife.

Forum software by © MyBB