There is a world somewhere between reality and fiction. Although ignored by many, it is very real and so are those living in it. This forum is about the natural world. Here, wild animals will be heard and respected. The forum offers a glimpse into an unknown world as well as a room with a view on the present and the future. Anyone able to speak on behalf of those living in the emerald forest and the deep blue sea is invited to join.
--- Peter Broekhuijsen ---

  • 2 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
BODY SIZE AND MASS OF NGORONGORO CRATER LIONS

Israel Amnon242 Offline
Tiger Enthusiast
****
#61
( This post was last modified: 02-17-2015, 11:16 PM by Amnon242 )

(02-17-2015, 07:59 PM)'chaos' Wrote:   Not for nothing, but Ammons comment is an opinion and Grizzlies comment don't even pertain to my argument
Thats your eveybody? impressive counter. Maybe I should reconsider my position. lol 
 

so now you are calling for more scientific approach/argumentation...or what? :-)

Relax chaos, I think there is general argreement here that crater lions are huge, that they are probably the biggest local group of lions in the world. The question is whether the 212 kg estimate is or is not exaggerated. Some of us have opinion that the real average is probably somewhat lower, for example 197 kg...and we are trying to discuss the thing. Thats all...there is no reason to be angry or unfriendly...for me personally this site is a place for pleasant relaxation after stressful work, so please avoid negative emotions :-)


 
1 user Likes Amnon242's post
Reply

Israel Amnon242 Offline
Tiger Enthusiast
****
#62
( This post was last modified: 02-17-2015, 11:09 PM by Amnon242 )

(02-17-2015, 06:00 AM)'tigerluver' Wrote: Peer-reviewed papers must be intrinsically respected, but they are not necessarily the final, undeniable word.
 

Exactly. For instance in various peer-reviewed papers amur tigers are said to be the largest felids...but we safely know that the title goes to bengal tigers - just example.

btw chaos...for a lion fan it could be quite "dangerous" (lol) to blindly follow articles published in peer-reviewed papers :-)
1 user Likes Amnon242's post
Reply

United States Pckts Offline
Bigcat Enthusiast
******
#63

(02-17-2015, 05:56 AM)'chaos' Wrote:
(02-17-2015, 05:43 AM)'Pckts' Wrote:
(02-17-2015, 05:05 AM)'chaos' Wrote: And?...............My posts are based solely on logic as to why craters could be larger. I am not the only person who
consider these lions to be one of, if not, the largest lion subspecies. Nobody knows why they're larger. Perhaps its
due to the craters environment. I'm not a scientist and I've never been there. According to waveriders previous posts
in this thread, the 212 kg estimate has been accepted as an educated "estimate" by peer reviewed scientific paper. That
carries way more weight than your desperate attempts to discredit anything and everything I believe in or post. 

~~For the benefit of everybody the above on the 212 kg estimate is NOT a fact but a comment on an educated estimate suggested by a peer-reviewed scientific paper.
 
That makes for a larger cat don't ya think? Now whether these are genetically identical to Serengeti's? I could give two shiites. The simple fact it
obviously irks you, is your issue. I, along with many others believe craters are a larger lion subspecies. Kinda like you believe Kaz tigers are the
largest tiger sub-species without any actual proof. Now, if you agree, we'll continue to disagree. I'm on board.  



 
The only thing that "irks me" is your refusal of anybody who disagrees with your claim.
Like you stated yourself, the 212 kg is NOT a fact.

Peter writes
"Regarding Ngorogoro lions. In spite of many decades of research in many regions in Africa and in spite of countless tables with weights, only one Ngorogoro male was actually weighed. It was a young adult, who scaled 146 kg. Very different from the computed average for young adults in the page above (206 kg.). A disappointing result, but there you have it. 

Anything to add? Yes. The regression equation was debated on AVA. Apollyon contacted Packer. The conclusion they got to was the equation was inadequate. More? Yes. I saw a few documentaries in which lions were measured. I noticed that chest girths were not taken in the proper way. They only measured half of the girth, as this meant they didn't have to move the lion. I understand (a male lion is a heavy animal), but I wouldn't get to satisfactory. There's one more thing. Everything I have on wild lions suggests adult males outaverage adult females by about 60-70 kg. Let's assume the average for Ngorogoro females (127 kg.) was right and let's also assume that Ngorogoro lions are big animals. I propose to take 70 kg. as the average difference. That would result in 197 kg. at best. Different from 212 kg. Maybe the relation between chest girth and weight is different in lions, tigers and bears.  "

Amnon
" ...too simple. Lions are social and rely on numbers. More food should result in more lions (ofc in bigger size as well...but only to some extent). Thats why size differences between various lion populations are limited.

...and as far as I know its rather the size of prey (and not the amout of prey...that much) what increases the size of lions. "

Gaute says:
"The formula is NOT from Packer, and was not provided TO Packer also. He directly say that, this is the point, period."


Grizzly
"Yeah, they are not exactly the descendants of the Kruger lions, but they surely belong to the South African clade.

On the other hand, the Crater lions not only belong to the East African clade, they were also directly descended from the colonial Serengeti lions. "

etc.

Everybody says the same more or less, this topic is pointless to discuss any further with you. Ill stick to discussing it with people who interpret and present data.





 


 


There is no data on craters. Tom is not a crater lion. We have no official weights or measurements. Very similar to Kaz tigers.
The fact scientists "estimate" them at over 210 kgs for an average, speaks loud and clear "Yea they're big". Tom was from the
Ngorgora Conservation area, not the crater.  I'm leaning with the scientific peer reviewed paper as opposed to the AVA debate.
No brainer there. I'm happy to move on to greener pastures.

 

The crater is with in the Conservation area!

"The Ngorongoro Conservation Area (NCA) is a conservation area and a UNESCO World Heritage Site located 180 km (110 mi) west of Arusha in the Crater Highlands area of Tanzania. Ngorongoro Crater, a large volcanic caldera WITHIN the area, is recognized by one private organization as one of the Seven Natural Wonders of Africa.[sup][3][/sup] The conservation area is administered by the Ngorongoro Conservation Area Authority, an arm of the Tanzanian government, and its boundaries follow the boundary of the Ngorongoro Division of the Arusha Region. "

 
Reply

United States Pckts Offline
Bigcat Enthusiast
******
#64

(02-17-2015, 06:00 AM)'tigerluver' Wrote: Peer-reviewed papers must be intrinsically respected, but they are not necessarily the final, undeniable word. By the conversations cited, something was off in the equation used and the peer-review did not catch it. Why? The peer-review process is not really focused on the data. The editors are rarely experts in the same concentration as the author. They do not know what is a right number and what's not. I'd say that a quarter of peer-reviewed works in the zoological and paleobiological field have some type of undetected data error. Rather if the work somehow gets past the "important enough" threshold, it will be more grammatically shredded than anything else. This is something to keep in mind when citing any peer-reviewed paper.

Regardless, if the chest girths are true, the transparent database indicates a population averaging about 200 kg, and a little less if the chest girth range given here if of only the young adults. A 200 kg average is comparable to the Smuts Kruger lion who were adjusted and weight on average of 188 kg, thus likely also in the 200 kg range of functional mass. In other words, the largest lion populations likely average around 200 kg.

Bengal tiger weights are pointed to often to show variation of mass across population, but from the scant data that I have posted before, the difference is essentially none. 

If and when corridors are established, variation in size across population will probably be near insignificant due to the high amounts of gene flow. For instance, in P. spelaea, its size from England to eastern Russia is essentially the same across forms due to free mixing of populations.At the same time, expect larger averages if corridors are ever established due to increase in genetic variability. Want an example?

Also, please don't quote huge chunks of texts, it wastes space on the page and isn't aesthetically pleasing. 

 



Exactly, also when comparing lets say "crater lions" to "kaziranga Tigers" we must take in to account time for morphological differences to occur. Kaziranga has had 100s of years for Tigers to attain different morphological attributes I:E: skull size for one, while Crater lions have only had 30 years or so to attain any difference in morphology compared to Serengeti, if any at all. Its not a climatic difference or terrain difference so there wouldn't need to be different charicteristics compared to lets say Marsh land in the Delta or Kaziranga. etc.
Reply

Israel Amnon242 Offline
Tiger Enthusiast
****
#65
( This post was last modified: 02-17-2015, 10:57 PM by Amnon242 )

(02-17-2015, 10:51 PM)'Pckts' Wrote:  The crater is with in the Conservation area!

"The Ngorongoro Conservation Area (NCA) is a conservation area and a UNESCO World Heritage Site located 180 km (110 mi) west of Arusha in the Crater Highlands area of Tanzania. Ngorongoro Crater, a large volcanic caldera WITHIN the area, is recognized by one private organization as one of the Seven Natural Wonders of Africa.[sup][3][/sup] The conservation area is administered by the Ngorongoro Conservation Area Authority, an arm of the Tanzanian government, and its boundaries follow the boundary of the Ngorongoro Division of the Arusha Region. "

 
 

No no, chaos is right, young tom is not directly from crater - he is from other part of NCA

 
Reply

United States Pckts Offline
Bigcat Enthusiast
******
#66
( This post was last modified: 02-17-2015, 11:15 PM by Pckts )

(02-17-2015, 10:55 PM)'Amnon242' Wrote:
(02-17-2015, 10:51 PM)'Pckts' Wrote:  The crater is with in the Conservation area!

"The Ngorongoro Conservation Area (NCA) is a conservation area and a UNESCO World Heritage Site located 180 km (110 mi) west of Arusha in the Crater Highlands area of Tanzania. Ngorongoro Crater, a large volcanic caldera WITHIN the area, is recognized by one private organization as one of the Seven Natural Wonders of Africa.[sup][3][/sup] The conservation area is administered by the Ngorongoro Conservation Area Authority, an arm of the Tanzanian government, and its boundaries follow the boundary of the Ngorongoro Division of the Arusha Region. "

 

 

No no, chaos is right, young tom is not directly from crater - he is from other part of NCA

 

 


The crater lies in the NCA
http://www.ngorongorocrater.org/

I don't know what part of the NCA he is from, but I just know they are all in the NCA.

Edit: I found where he is from.
Where is this in proximity to the Crater?
"In mid-October, however, Ingela and staff from the local Ndutu Lodge were notified that an injured, male lion had been spotted lying under a tree in the Ngorongoro’s Hugo Valley area. "


If you google map it, it is right dead center of the NCA
https://www.google.com/maps/search/Ngoro...7150206,7z
Reply

Israel Amnon242 Offline
Tiger Enthusiast
****
#67
( This post was last modified: 02-17-2015, 11:33 PM by Amnon242 )

(02-17-2015, 11:05 PM)'Pckts' Wrote: Edit: I found where he is from.
Where is this in proximity to the Crater?
"In mid-October, however, Ingela and staff from the local Ndutu Lodge were notified that an injured, male lion had been spotted lying under a tree in the Ngorongoro’s Hugo Valley area. "

If you google map it, it is right dead center of the NCA
https://www.google.com/maps/search/Ngoro...7150206,7z

 

...so he is not directly from the crater...

btw please don't quote huge chunks of texts, it wastes space on the page and isn't aesthetically pleasing. :-) 
Reply

United States Pckts Offline
Bigcat Enthusiast
******
#68
( This post was last modified: 02-17-2015, 11:43 PM by Pckts )

(02-17-2015, 11:32 PM)'Amnon242' Wrote:
(02-17-2015, 11:05 PM)'Pckts' Wrote: Edit: I found where he is from.
Where is this in proximity to the Crater?
"In mid-October, however, Ingela and staff from the local Ndutu Lodge were notified that an injured, male lion had been spotted lying under a tree in the Ngorongoro’s Hugo Valley area. "

If you google map it, it is right dead center of the NCA
https://www.google.com/maps/search/Ngoro...7150206,7z


 

...so he is not directly from the crater...

btw please don't quote huge chunks of texts, it wastes space on the page and isn't aesthetically pleasing. :-) 

 

It was a pretty small quote.
So please tell me the difference between the "Ngorongoro’s Hugo Valley area" and the "Ngorongoro's Crater".
What is the distance between them, where is one located compared to the other?
I have been able to find the Lodge but not the Hugo Valley.
 
Reply

Israel Amnon242 Offline
Tiger Enthusiast
****
#69
( This post was last modified: 02-17-2015, 11:44 PM by Amnon242 )

(02-17-2015, 11:35 PM)'Pckts' Wrote: It was a pretty small quote.
So please tell me the difference between the "Ngorongoro’s Hugo Valley area" and the "Ngorongoro's Crater".
What is the distance between them, where is one located compared to the other?

 

but your posts above are huge like crater lions :-)
I dont know where it is, but I found nothing like Hugo Valley in the crater. BTW Ndutu area is at the border with Serengeti.

...btw photos and videos of young tom are again one nice example of how misleading they are - because young tom looks like quite robust felid...and 146 kg is not much for a lion of that age. But perhaps he was in bad shape when weighted (injured) and the photos and videos are taken later...

 
Reply

United States Pckts Offline
Bigcat Enthusiast
******
#70

(02-17-2015, 11:39 PM)'Amnon242' Wrote: but your posts above are huge like crater lions :-)
I dont know where it is, but I found nothing like Hugo Valley in the crater. BTW Ndutu area is at the border with Serengeti.

...btw photos and videos of young tom are again one nice example of how misleading they are - because young tom looks like quite robust felid...and 146 kg is not much for a lion of that age. But perhaps he was in bad shape when weighted (injured) and the photos and videos are taken later...

 

 


There you go [img]images/smilies/tongue.gif[/img]
You can actually see his size when captured as well.
The lodge is on the border but that is not where he was found, that is who was called to check on it.
http://www.panthera.org/blog/young-tom-t...and-rescue
Scroll through to see him during capture, sedation and release. He doesn't look skinny during capture that is for sure, especially the image of him with the female vet in front. He has some nice sized limbs on him.
146 kg is a decent size for a Tom of 4 years of age, nothing special by any means but he could still put on another 50+kg of size in the next 4-6 years.

He is from the Masek Pride, so I will look up where they are inside the NCA.

 
Reply

Israel Amnon242 Offline
Tiger Enthusiast
****
#71
( This post was last modified: 02-18-2015, 12:06 AM by Amnon242 )

(02-17-2015, 11:52 PM)'Pckts' Wrote: 146 kg is a decent size for a Tom of 4 years of age, nothing special by any means but he could still put on another 50+kg of size in the next 4-6 years.

He is from the Masek Pride, so I will look up where they are inside the NCA.

  
50+ kg? Oh no...at this age he probably wont be any longer or taller...and he is already quite massive. Give him 20-30 kg max.

BTW I know about one amur tiger who is around 220 kg at the age of 2. According to you, he should be well over 300 kg in his prime :-)
Another example - I think you know the table with the data on growth of 3 bengal tigers (2 males, 1 female). The males were 200 kg at the age of 2...so again..they should hit 300 kg in their prime :-)
 
1 user Likes Amnon242's post
Reply

United States Pckts Offline
Bigcat Enthusiast
******
#72
( This post was last modified: 02-18-2015, 12:00 AM by Pckts )

Info on the Masek Pride and the Big Marsh Pride
MASEK PRIDE
This pride resides near the Masek Area. It appears that the pride is comprised of three females who have taken interest in the Big Marsh Pride males. They have been witnesses climbing trees in the area and are the only lions in the region to do so .In early December, two females from the Masek Pride were seen with Fluffyless from the Big Marsh Pride. They disappeared until mid February when they were seen again near Lake Ndutu within the Olasiti Pride territory. Again, they were with Fluffyless and his brother.
http://www.safaridealsafrica.com/flexlea...lions.html

 THE BIG MARSH PRIDE
This is the largest pride with 16 members including 8 cubs, 6 females, and two males—“Fluffyless” and his brother. The camp biologist originally tallied the pride to 13 members, but in late March, a female emerged with two month-old cubs. They named her, Mama Wawili, which means “Mother of Two” in Swahili. The end of March is a difficult time to be born as soon the migration will be making its way north and the food sources will dwindle. The pride is large and well-established, though.Whitey – the matriarch of the Big Marsh Pride is distinctive in her tawny color, which is lighter than the others.All members of the pride have been seen regularly within the marsh territory. The older cubs were about 9 – 10 months old when the camp biologist first began tracking them and the younger cubs were 5 – 6 months old. The two males typically are away from the group courting females from the Olasiti and Masek prides.
Reply

chaos Offline
wildlife enthusiast
***
#73

(02-17-2015, 10:41 PM)'Amnon242' Wrote:
(02-17-2015, 07:59 PM)'chaos' Wrote:   Not for nothing, but Ammons comment is an opinion and Grizzlies comment don't even pertain to my argument
Thats your eveybody? impressive counter. Maybe I should reconsider my position. lol 

 

so now you are calling for more scientific approach/argumentation...or what? :-)

Relax chaos, I think there is general argreement here that crater lions are huge, that they are probably the biggest local group of lions in the world. The question is whether the 212 kg estimate is or is not exaggerated. Some of us have opinion that the real average is probably somewhat lower, for example 197 kg...and we are trying to discuss the thing. Thats all...there is no reason to be angry or unfriendly...for me personally this site is a place for pleasant relaxation after stressful work, so please avoid negative emotions :-)


 

 


~~ Thats all...there is no reason to be angry or unfriendly...for me personally this site is a place for pleasant relaxation after stressful work, so please avoid negative emotions :-)



No malice on my end.  There's enough familiarity amongst us to realize no harm intended.
Reply

United States Pckts Offline
Bigcat Enthusiast
******
#74

(02-17-2015, 11:59 PM)'Amnon242' Wrote:
(02-17-2015, 11:52 PM)'Pckts' Wrote: 146 kg is a decent size for a Tom of 4 years of age, nothing special by any means but he could still put on another 50+kg of size in the next 4-6 years.

He is from the Masek Pride, so I will look up where they are inside the NCA.

  
50+ kg? Oh no...at this age he probably wont be any longer or taller...and he is already quite massive. Give him 20-30 kg max.

BTW I know about one amur tiger who is around 220 kg at the age of 2. According to you, he should be well over 300 kg in his prime :-)
Another example - I think you know the table with the data on growth of 3 bengal tigers (2 males, 1 female). The males were 200 kg at the age of 2...so again..they should hit 300 kg in their prime :-)
 

 


I don't like to use any captive weights for Amurs (if that is what you're quoting) just because they do so well there and I am not sure if that is actually due to the fact that they can put quite a bit of fat in captivity compared to their wild counterparts.
I don't think its unreasonable to put on another 40kg or so by the time he reached 8. But that is what peter and I are talking about now, we should start to take note the amount of varience in size of animals in different age group and how much they actually put on as the reach their prime age and what exactly that might be.
 
Reply

chaos Offline
wildlife enthusiast
***
#75
( This post was last modified: 02-18-2015, 07:54 PM by chaos )

(02-17-2015, 10:44 PM)'Amnon242' Wrote:
(02-17-2015, 06:00 AM)'tigerluver' Wrote: Peer-reviewed papers must be intrinsically respected, but they are not necessarily the final, undeniable word.

 

Exactly. For instance in various peer-reviewed papers amur tigers are said to be the largest felids...but we safely know that the title goes to bengal tigers - just example.

btw chaos...for a lion fan it could be quite "dangerous" (lol) to blindly follow articles published in peer-reviewed papers :-)

 

~~btw chaos...for a lion fan it could be quite "dangerous" (lol) to blindly follow articles published in peer-reviewed papers :-)


Thats odd, because I'm not feeling any sense of dread. Truth is certain people get very uncomfortable when anything positive
about lions is posted.(size, hunting potential, fighting prowess) Its entertaining. This is not intended as provocative in nature,
but a simple observation. Why is that? We are all adults, correct?
1 user Likes chaos's post
Reply






Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

About Us
Go Social     Subscribe  

Welcome to WILDFACT forum, a website that focuses on sharing the joy that wildlife has on offer. We welcome all wildlife lovers to join us in sharing that joy. As a member you can share your research, knowledge and experience on animals with the community.
wildfact.com is intended to serve as an online resource for wildlife lovers of all skill levels from beginners to professionals and from all fields that belong to wildlife anyhow. Our focus area is wild animals from all over world. Content generated here will help showcase the work of wildlife experts and lovers to the world. We believe by the help of your informative article and content we will succeed to educate the world, how these beautiful animals are important to survival of all man kind.
Many thanks for visiting wildfact.com. We hope you will keep visiting wildfact regularly and will refer other members who have passion for wildlife.

Forum software by © MyBB