Persian Leopard (Panthera pardus saxicolor)

[GuateGojira]

(04-30-2022, 03:07 AM)LonePredator Wrote: Exactly! It’s such a shame that all these types of sources such as NatGeo and all these have so much stupid information. It makes me even more angry when I see such false informatio floating around on thousands of YouTube channels.

They even give bite force in psi and I have seen that they say Siberian tigers have weaker bite force than Bengal even though Siberians have bigger skulls than Bengals on average.

And taking their false claim in count that Siberians are also bigger weight. I don’t understand how they could say that Siberians have weaker bite force when at the other hand they say that Siberians are bigger.

These sources such as NatGeo really disappoint me.

Sadly NatGeo have very low standars in these days, but Discovery and History channels are even worst! I can tell you, there is no good scientific TV in these days, and is sad if you think about it. The old days of documentaries and tv shows with scientific aproach like "Paleoworld" already ended.


Internet is a great tool to investigate but only if you know how to use it. The webpage of NatGeo is not accurate, and Youtube is certainly one of the worst places to search for information. I don't give a cent for the information about animals that many channels share, but sadly many people (specially young ones) prefer a ridiculous video insted fo READING a book. Reply