Lions of Sabi Sands

[Potato]

"Mapogos confront 2 coalitions with more numbers than 2.....Majingilane and Selati....Both of these coalitions were nomadic that time and from both lost their territory...."

1. As I had put it in previous comment both of that situations were not streight foreward as you hardly try to implement. 
2. I provided you list of Mapogo's battles. It wasn't only two with number more than 2. No matter how many times you reapeat that lie it won't become truth. 

3. Why you consider vicotry in 2vs3 fight any worst than 4vs5. It is actually 2vs3 which is in higher numerical disadvantage.
4. Difference between Majingilanes and Mapogos is that Majingilanes got to fight their most important fights when they were in their prime, while Mapogos got that fights when they were past prime with depleted numbers. It is not Mapogos to blame that while they were in prime  they had noone they could prove themselfs against as Majingilanes had Salatis (beside Mlovathis which had couple of good fights as I mentioned in previous post).
5. If we would take your downgrading logic then we could as well say somethink like: "Majingilanes could only fight with numerical advantage. The only times they fought outnumbered were Salati youngsters, yet not ready to fight and Matimba males which also ended up in steal mate, not a victory. Even when they had numerical advantage they still had to separate enemy (Salatis in 2014) to be able to win as even with equal numbers they were chassed around by Southern Matimbas and Matshaipirs (actually Matshaipiris chassed them in numerical disadvantage). Moreover in the end when they lost their numerical advantage (Golden Mane died) they just died, couldn't even take care of them selfs." You may notice I did not even put any lie in it, just put truth in downgrading way. Of course I myself I do not agree with such point of view, but this is exactly how you talk about Mapogos. You do not give them justice, just downgrade everythink they done. Reply