Freak Specimens

[GrizzlyClaws]

(06-01-2014, 09:53 AM)'GuateGojira' Wrote:

(06-01-2014, 09:45 AM)'GrizzlyClaws' Wrote: The pic doesn't work.

According to peter, a 90mm canine in the straight line from the gumline might be too much for a big cat.


 

How doesn't work? If you can't see it, I can upload it in other type.

As for the 90 mm canine, maybe the right figure will be lower if taken in straight line. For the moment, based in the picture that I post, I think that the canines of the wild tigers are measured in straight line. In that case, the record canines of 75 mm from Madla are about the maximum in the wild, and the canines of the captive Amur will be about 80 mm, if taken in the same way.
 

 

Based on the same proportion, the canine of "Amur" is slightly over 80mm if its skull is 43cm.

The tiger species is always quite symmetric, even the wild Bengal and the captive Amur can also have very similar proportion.
  Reply