There is a world somewhere between reality and fiction. Although ignored by many, it is very real and so are those living in it. This forum is about the natural world. Here, wild animals will be heard and respected. The forum offers a glimpse into an unknown world as well as a room with a view on the present and the future. Anyone able to speak on behalf of those living in the emerald forest and the deep blue sea is invited to join.
--- Peter Broekhuijsen ---

  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Largest recorded Tiger and a Lion in Scientific records.

rishabh.d Offline
New Join
#1

What is the largest recorded Wild Tiger and a Wild Lion in scientific records ? Please give as much detail as possible.
Reply

GuateGojira Offline
Expert & Researcher
*****
#2

(05-10-2023, 12:41 PM)rishabh.d Wrote: What is the largest recorded Wild Tiger and a Wild Lion in scientific records ? Please give as much detail as possible.

In Biology, "largest" is normally related with body mass, so the heaviest male wild tiger and male wild lion are the next ones:


Heaviest tiger - Nepal - 272 kg+ - 260 kg empty:

*This image is copyright of its original author


Heaviest lion - Namibia - 260 kg - 240 kg empty:

*This image is copyright of its original author


Of course there are other records, like the cattle-killer of 272 kg from Kenya, and a huge tiger of 288 kg from India, but the first one is an outlier that gorged from cattle and the second is confirmed but still not published. So, for the moment, I will stick to the records that I showed here to you.

Here is a bigger image of the picture of Sauraha male tiger:

*This image is copyright of its original author
2 users Like GuateGojira's post
Reply

United States chaos Offline
wildlife enthusiast
***
#3
( This post was last modified: 08-08-2023, 03:05 AM by chaos )

(08-08-2023, 12:21 AM)GuateGojira Wrote:
(05-10-2023, 12:41 PM)rishabh.d Wrote: What is the largest recorded Wild Tiger and a Wild Lion in scientific records ? Please give as much detail as possible.

In Biology, "largest" is normally related with body mass, so the heaviest male wild tiger and male wild lion are the next ones:


Heaviest tiger - Nepal - 272 kg+ - 260 kg empty:

*This image is copyright of its original author


Heaviest lion - Namibia - 260 kg - 240 kg empty:

*This image is copyright of its original author


Of course there are other records, like the cattle-killer of 272 kg from Kenya, and a huge tiger of 288 kg from India, but the first one is an outlier that gorged from cattle and the second is confirmed but still not published. So, for the moment, I will stick to the records that I showed here to you.

Here is a bigger image of the picture of Sauraha male tiger:

*This image is copyright of its original author

What about the 280/253 kg lion from Timbavati? Does that one count?
Reply

GuateGojira Offline
Expert & Researcher
*****
#4

(08-08-2023, 03:05 AM)chaos Wrote: What about the 280/253 kg lion from Timbavati? Does that one count?

I take in count in my tables, but been honest that figure is not published, is not in any document, any paper, any news article, nothing, even the website delete it! So, what evidence we have of it? We know about it only from a few emails, so I include it just for been "polite", but in a real scientific publication that figure will be discarded with no problem. In fact, if we follow the protocol of Slaght et al. (2005), that figure will be "unreliable".

Did I use it? Yes, why not. Is this the heaviest in scientific record? No, as for been a "scientific" record it must be published in a "scientific" paper. The same happen, for example with the huge tiger reported by Dr Jhala, we can use it but is not published, so I will not quote it with my name on it.
Reply

United States chaos Offline
wildlife enthusiast
***
#5

(08-08-2023, 03:17 AM)GuateGojira Wrote:
(08-08-2023, 03:05 AM)chaos Wrote: What about the 280/253 kg lion from Timbavati? Does that one count?

I take in count in my tables, but been honest that figure is not published, is not in any document, any paper, any news article, nothing, even the website delete it! So, what evidence we have of it? We know about it only from a few emails, so I include it just for been "polite", but in a real scientific publication that figure will be discarded with no problem. In fact, if we follow the protocol of Slaght et al. (2005), that figure will be "unreliable".

Did I use it? Yes, why not. Is this the heaviest in scientific record? No, as for been a "scientific" record it must be published in a "scientific" paper. The same happen, for example with the huge tiger reported by Dr Jhala, we can use it but is not published, so I will not quote it with my name on it.

OK. that's fair enough. BTW, a big shout out to all the old timers. You know who you are......LOL
1 user Likes chaos's post
Reply






Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

About Us
Go Social     Subscribe  

Welcome to WILDFACT forum, a website that focuses on sharing the joy that wildlife has on offer. We welcome all wildlife lovers to join us in sharing that joy. As a member you can share your research, knowledge and experience on animals with the community.
wildfact.com is intended to serve as an online resource for wildlife lovers of all skill levels from beginners to professionals and from all fields that belong to wildlife anyhow. Our focus area is wild animals from all over world. Content generated here will help showcase the work of wildlife experts and lovers to the world. We believe by the help of your informative article and content we will succeed to educate the world, how these beautiful animals are important to survival of all man kind.
Many thanks for visiting wildfact.com. We hope you will keep visiting wildfact regularly and will refer other members who have passion for wildlife.

Forum software by © MyBB