Tigers have good endurance?

[Shadow]

(05-02-2019, 03:00 PM)Sanju Wrote:

(05-02-2019, 02:47 PM)Rage2277 Wrote: shadow has a point,many people actually think amurs average 300kgs it's kind of insane the same is being said for atlas lions..

I know many think like that due to lack of knowledge and bias or fanaticism.

(05-02-2019, 02:47 PM)Rage2277 Wrote: i hate these vids,they're so bad..

Most videos are misleading BUT THIS VIDEO DON'T COME UNDER THAT CATEGORY. They just said "up-to", no where near pronunciation of "usually or routinely". Nothing wrong.

(05-02-2019, 02:46 PM)Spalea Wrote: Danielle Dufault is a very good graphic designer, and not a biologist and she is young therefore very enthusiastic !

She is not a biologist but enthusiastic to show her talent and skill of art work by hosting in the you tube channel show like I said before but the crew has biology experts who design the script. Pls don't misunderstand and involve her in this.

Again they said only "upto" if anyone who (those younger people) see the video think tigers usually weigh 300 kg, then they can be considered as deaf.

I don't know why this discussion is prolonging when there is nothing to discuss whether relevant or irrelevant to the smedz thread topic.

I gave that weight only as an example about it, that why this kind of videos can be seen in different ways, it wasn´t meant to start a weight discussion. I gave some criticism and one example about it how that video can give wrong impressions, because based on this video smedz had a question. And what comes to that question he had, claim on that video was also quite strong about a bit controversial matter, imo. I would have loved to hear to what she based that claim, that tigers would be big cats with most endurance and able to chase prey longer than others. I don´t know if that is true or false, but when saying it so clearly, then also some reasoning would be good to have. 

So no, that weight is not relevant alone, but it was an example to explain, why I said, that it is good to be careful with information told in that video. And same thing with many other videos in youtube. Nowadays so many channels provide content which looks like professionally made and then total nonsense. This video now was quite ok in many ways, but also then again not too... hmmm... well, I wouldn´t call it quality documentary overall. 

But what comes to question Smedz asked, that is interesting and I am not sure, that we heard on video well studied and undeniable fact, but one hypothesis and I also would like to know to what it is based on? Or is that commonly agreed fact which I and some others have missed for some reason? Reply