There is a world somewhere between reality and fiction. Although ignored by many, it is very real and so are those living in it. This forum is about the natural world. Here, wild animals will be heard and respected. The forum offers a glimpse into an unknown world as well as a room with a view on the present and the future. Anyone able to speak on behalf of those living in the emerald forest and the deep blue sea is invited to join.
--- Peter Broekhuijsen ---

  • 6 Vote(s) - 3.83 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Skulls, Skeletons, Canines & Claws

United States tigerluver Offline
Prehistoric Feline Expert
*****
Moderators
( This post was last modified: 10-31-2016, 06:00 AM by tigerluver )

(10-30-2016, 05:41 AM)GrizzlyClaws Wrote: Here at the post #90 is a holotype of a set of three lion canines (two upper and one lower) with all details available.

http://wildfact.com/forum/topic-big-cat-s-canines-and-claws?page=6



Here at the post #137 is the densest holotype available for the tiger canine. And it has been weighed at 67 grams, but this canine has been worn a lot. So without it, it should weigh around 70 grams.

http://wildfact.com/forum/topic-big-cat-s-canines-and-claws?page=10




If we compare these two holotypes, the length/width ratio for lion is 0.27, and the length/width ratio for tiger is 0.31.

Maybe @tigerluver could make an elaborate calculation/formula to explain the volume/density difference between the two holotypes?

Density is based on volume, which is 3-d, thus mass must be divided by a cubed measurement (ie. mm^3).

Usually we have three measurements on canines, length, width, and depth, at best.

So here are 3 ways we can get an actual density value with a cubed unit. I'll use the superior lion canines referenced in @GrizzlyClaws post to show the math.

You could divide the mass of the canine by the cube of its length:
Canine density = canine mass/(length)^3
Canine 1: 51.6 g/(106 mm)^3 = 4.33e-5
Canine 2: 51 g/(105^3) = 4.40e-5

You can substitute any other measurement and cube that as well. However, as this calculation takes into account only one measurement and forces a cubed value out of it, it is the least accurate.
 
Another way could be to force a cubed unit out of two measurements. You can take the length and multiply it by the square of a width/depth measurement as follows:
Canine density = canine mass/(length * width^2)
Canine 1: 51.6 g/(106 * 29^2) = 5.79e-4
Canine 2: 51 g/(105 * 28^2) = 6.20e-4

More accurate the previous method as two dimensions are working to create a 3-D model.

Finally, you can use a length, width, and depth measurements to get a cubed measurements without forcing anything as the last two methods did:
Canine density = canine mass/(length * width * depth)
Canine 1: 51.6 g/(106 * 29 * 20) = 8.39e-4
Canine 2: 51 g/(105*28*20) = 8.67e-4

This would be the most accurate out of what is in this post as you actually dividing a mass by a true volumetric measurement. Of course, you could buff density accuracy in others ways, but that's too complex for what we need here.

The tiger canine referenced unfortunately only shows to measurements (length = 103 mm; width = 32 mm).

We have to use the second method for comparison with the lion canines.

Tiger canine density = 70 g/(103 * 32^2) = 6.64e-4

The two lion canines average to 6.00e-4 for the same measurement, which is ~10% less dense. The actually discrepancy can still be different, as we forced a 3D measurement in this case and did not account for canine depth. We did not account for the way each canine is shaped either.
9 users Like tigerluver's post
Reply

United States GrizzlyClaws Offline
Canine Expert
*****
Moderators
( This post was last modified: 10-31-2016, 04:55 AM by GrizzlyClaws )

@tigerluver

Thanks a lot for explaining everything with an elaborate formula, that's what I explained before, the density is correlated with the volume.

When both specimens are older males with the solid canines, only the volume would determine the density.
5 users Like GrizzlyClaws's post
Reply

United States GrizzlyClaws Offline
Canine Expert
*****
Moderators

Brown bear canines



*This image is copyright of its original author
5 users Like GrizzlyClaws's post
Reply

United States GrizzlyClaws Offline
Canine Expert
*****
Moderators

Brown bear claws



*This image is copyright of its original author



*This image is copyright of its original author
5 users Like GrizzlyClaws's post
Reply

United States GrizzlyClaws Offline
Canine Expert
*****
Moderators

Brown bear canines



*This image is copyright of its original author
5 users Like GrizzlyClaws's post
Reply

United States GrizzlyClaws Offline
Canine Expert
*****
Moderators

Asiatic Black bear



*This image is copyright of its original author



*This image is copyright of its original author



*This image is copyright of its original author
4 users Like GrizzlyClaws's post
Reply

India parvez Offline
Tiger enthusiast
*****
( This post was last modified: 10-31-2016, 10:30 AM by parvez )

(10-31-2016, 04:03 AM)GrizzlyClaws Wrote: @parvez

- The density of the canine is based on the volume and solidness. The robust canine is denser than the slender canine, and the solid canine is denser than the hollow canine. The robustness of canine depends among different individuals or gender, while the hollowness depends on the age of the individuals, the older individuals always got less cavity inside.


- As for the leopard which I forgot to answer previously, all leopard canines seem to be slender so far which I have yet to see a particularly robust specimen.
That is interesting. I mean the way the hollowness reduces with age. In humans I assume they become weak with age meaning the cavity may not decrease atleast with age. May be the experience and expertise of using them makes them harder leading to decrease in hollow space.
It seems there is a rhythm in nature through which canines become robust, the rythm may be achieved only through invincibility through whatever they face including competitors, surroundings, prey etc
Only if emerged victorious invincibly through this long process the offspring of this successful animal seem to develop compact canines. Leapords seem to fail through this process as they are relatively weaker than jaguar, lead style of escaping bigger predators like lion and tiger. Though they are top predators in some eco systems their instincts does not seem to fade away like fearing bigger predators. That may be the reason for their slender canines. At least for some reason they are unable to achieve invincibility as they may be poor swimmers or unable to hunt in water. Jaguars on other hand seem to have achieved the invincibility through whatever they came across.
2 users Like parvez's post
Reply

United States GrizzlyClaws Offline
Canine Expert
*****
Moderators

@parvez

The post #120 of this thread has the sample of the sub-adult tiger canines, the inside is all fluid, not solid like the older tiger canines. Animals and humans evolved in the opposite way.

The Clouded leopards also got very slender canines, perhaps for the same reason as the leopard.
1 user Likes GrizzlyClaws's post
Reply

India parvez Offline
Tiger enthusiast
*****

(10-31-2016, 11:02 AM)GrizzlyClaws Wrote: @parvez

The post #120 of this thread has the sample of the sub-adult tiger canines, the inside is all fluid, not solid like the older tiger canines. Animals and humans evolved in the opposite way.

The Clouded leopards also got very slender canines, perhaps for the same reason as the leopard.

Thanks grizzly claws those canines are not fully developed. They may be the next stage to milk teeth. Just like in humans too but it Is opposite in old age as you said. Thanks for sharing. If humans were wild even today they may be having compactor canines as they became old.
1 user Likes parvez's post
Reply

United States GrizzlyClaws Offline
Canine Expert
*****
Moderators
( This post was last modified: 10-31-2016, 11:53 AM by GrizzlyClaws )

These canines were still at the earlier stage of the permanent teeth. The root of the canines were still unsealed which needs more nourishment through the nervous systems. That's why the canine teeth can maintain the creamy white coloration.

After that, the root would be sealed as the cavity starts to disappear, and the canine teeth start to need less nourishment and the coloration would still start to turn yellowish.
1 user Likes GrizzlyClaws's post
Reply

India parvez Offline
Tiger enthusiast
*****

What is the relation between coloration and sealing of cavities? Does the fluid from cavity responsible for maintaining white coloration @Grizzly claws
1 user Likes parvez's post
Reply

United States GrizzlyClaws Offline
Canine Expert
*****
Moderators
( This post was last modified: 10-31-2016, 12:26 PM by GrizzlyClaws )

I think the fluid presents the blood vessels and nerves, since the young tigers may require a lot of these in order to absorb more nutrition to grow their teeth.

And the older tigers may require less nutrition for teeth growth, and the cavity becomes smaller. And with less blood vessels and nerves flow within it, the teeth could turn into the less whitening coloration.

I am not a biologist, maybe @peter could provide you an even more elaborate answer.
1 user Likes GrizzlyClaws's post
Reply

India parvez Offline
Tiger enthusiast
*****

(10-31-2016, 12:22 PM)GrizzlyClaws Wrote: I think the fluid presents the blood vessels and nerves, since the young tigers may require a lot of these in order to absorb more nutrition to grow their teeth.

And the older tigers may require less nutrition for teeth growth, and the cavity becomes smaller. And with less blood vessels and nerves flow within it, the teeth could turn into the less whitening coloration.

I am not a biologist, maybe @peter could provide you an even more elaborate answer.
May be the fluid helps in frequent cleaning of teeth. Hence it maintains white coloration. With the sealing of cavity the fluid cannot flow out and hence cannot help in maintaining the colour of teeth through moisturizing. Anyways peter can confirm this as you said
1 user Likes parvez's post
Reply

United States GrizzlyClaws Offline
Canine Expert
*****
Moderators

Brown bear canines



*This image is copyright of its original author



*This image is copyright of its original author



*This image is copyright of its original author



*This image is copyright of its original author



*This image is copyright of its original author



*This image is copyright of its original author



*This image is copyright of its original author



*This image is copyright of its original author



*This image is copyright of its original author



*This image is copyright of its original author
7 users Like GrizzlyClaws's post
Reply

United States GrizzlyClaws Offline
Canine Expert
*****
Moderators

Amur tiger



*This image is copyright of its original author



*This image is copyright of its original author



*This image is copyright of its original author



*This image is copyright of its original author



*This image is copyright of its original author
3 users Like GrizzlyClaws's post
Reply






Users browsing this thread:
3 Guest(s)

About Us
Go Social     Subscribe  

Welcome to WILDFACT forum, a website that focuses on sharing the joy that wildlife has on offer. We welcome all wildlife lovers to join us in sharing that joy. As a member you can share your research, knowledge and experience on animals with the community.
wildfact.com is intended to serve as an online resource for wildlife lovers of all skill levels from beginners to professionals and from all fields that belong to wildlife anyhow. Our focus area is wild animals from all over world. Content generated here will help showcase the work of wildlife experts and lovers to the world. We believe by the help of your informative article and content we will succeed to educate the world, how these beautiful animals are important to survival of all man kind.
Many thanks for visiting wildfact.com. We hope you will keep visiting wildfact regularly and will refer other members who have passion for wildlife.

Forum software by © MyBB