There is a world somewhere between reality and fiction. Although ignored by many, it is very real and so are those living in it. This forum is about the natural world. Here, wild animals will be heard and respected. The forum offers a glimpse into an unknown world as well as a room with a view on the present and the future. Anyone able to speak on behalf of those living in the emerald forest and the deep blue sea is invited to join.
My mistake was in thinking that the "Congo" is the low-land jungle basin. Everything that I had ever read of the Congo talked about this particular habitat. I had no idea that the Congo includes the high plateau with grasslands and a drier forest. However, I was correct that lions have never conquered the true jungle environment. I still disagree with pckts that a tiger would be unable to do so, although introducing tigers would probably the a terrible idea for the natural wildlife of the Congo's jungle basin.
Pckts asked: "If the lion had successfully conquered this habitat, the African Congo would have more lions than the African savanna."
How do you come up with this? I was referring to before the advance of heavy human populations and destruction. I mentioned that lions have been around since the late Pleistocene and, had they adapted to the Congo ( all of the Congo including the low-land jungle ) they would have been safer from human hunters. But, evidently, lions are not well suited for forest life.