Modern weights and measurements on wild tigers

[abhisingh7]

(10-22-2022, 08:16 PM)JUJOMORE Wrote: I think that what had begun with the simple presentation of an infographic to give a rough idea of the size of Wagdoh has been unnecessarily complicated despite the explanations that in each case I have given

(10-21-2022, 10:51 AM)LonePredator Wrote: Maybe robably because the thickness of the heel pad is excluded and the height is only taken from shoulder to the heel or many other possibilities. But there’s no reason to question official measurements by looking a picture of an animal.

Why not? Of Wagdoh there are many photographs, not just one and it is evident that it is a relatively short animal. If a measure is against what I see, it seems totally logical to me to study it and give an opinion accordingly. I do not force anyone to believe anything, I only present my opinions

(10-21-2022, 10:51 AM)LonePredator Wrote: All these records aren’t fake, are they? There’s a lot of factors that could be involved and you can’t deny official measurements by looking at pictures and editing them around.

I have never said that all those records were fakes, I didn't even think about it, I consider them good and that's it, but if any of them catch my attention I review it with all the means at my disposal. By the way, there are methods to estimate the size of leopards in the wild using photographs
 
I had planned to comment on a method to analyze proportions based on photographs, but in view of the conflict generated, it is better to forget it.

Reply

Attached Files

Image(s)