Lions in South-Africa, Zimbabwe and Namibia

[Rabubi]

(08-21-2024, 11:53 PM)BA0701 Wrote:

(08-21-2024, 08:27 PM)Rabubi Wrote:

(08-21-2024, 05:04 PM)Tr1x24 Wrote:

(08-19-2024, 05:21 AM)Mwk85 Wrote: Marakele, he died from injuries sustained in a fight with a younger male, believed to be Ukuva, one of the sons of Tembe that was relocated to the area some weeks back.

His opponent was treated..not sure how is this "fair" (unless he killed him straight in 1vs1)..

So, these reserves are bringing "new" younger males to the reserves (who eventually kill resident famous males) to bring diversety in the reserve? 

Thats a big "f.... u.." for the resident male, who is face of the reserve..

Yea i know they have a lot of males in these reserves with little space, but stil.

What happened to Marakele is very unfortunate but I don't believe that these reserves want to witness a bloodletting and they treated Ukuva to mitigate the results of the conflict.

Translocating this young male into the reserve is to bring genetic diversity as well as to regulate population dynamics by ousting the resident male. Addo Elephant National Park translocated lions in such a way that birth rates were relatively low to keep the density of lions manageable. In the absence of intraspecific competition, lions can breed like rabbits and the prey population will struggle to keep up with such growth in lion numbers, not to mention the other predators that share the same habitat as lions.

Does this mean Marakele deserved to die? Absolutely not. But I believe they were right in translocating Ukuva for the above reasons.

I understand their reasoning, for why they are moving these cats, and believe they were entirely well intended, it is the locations they are being moved to that causes some to question their thinking. Just look at what happened to the three Addo boys, that was a full on tragedy, especially the first male that was killed. Some things are entirely unpredictable, these are wild big cats after all, but potential conflict with other lions in the direct vicinity can surely be taken into account. If I were to dump a new and unknown lion(s) into Western Sector SS, I would be doing so with the understanding that there will be conflict, and there is a very good chance that lions would die as a result, either the new lion(s) or the existing, who call WS SS home, either way. I would, in fact, be very surprised if that didn't happen.

I totally support their attempting to keep numbers balanced, in fact if there was an agency or group that was doing that in a safer way, I would have no issue donating to them, as they clearly would have a shared goal. However, I am one that believes that nature is capable of taking care of things herself. A century ago, there was nobody moving animals from one location to another, and the numbers across all species remained in balance, things just worked, not only were the prey animals in more abundance, but so were the lions. I just believe that all of the problems that exist for all wildlife, are the direct result of action(s) taken by humans, and just like government, I do not know if humans are capable of fixing what they themselves have broken, how about letting nature take the wheel for awhile. .

We were recently discussing the numbers of lions in SS, pre-Mapogo, and it seems those numbers have never recovered to what they were. I may be critical of certain actions taken by people on the ground, but it is largely because of certain things that appear obvious to us on the outside, and if that is the case why does it seem to be less obvious to some of those on the inside. The recent relocation of the Mjejane Pride is another perfect example, did we not learn after moving the last Mpondo male and his partner to the same general area? Not to mention the leaving behind of the young male, which I believe is only going to end in one way for him. The situation of lions disappearing and being killed and attacked by humans in the Mara is another example. It seems to us on the outside, if they merely enforced the laws that exist, stop the herders from cutting down fences and driving their herds into the lions territory, it would stop a lot of what is currently happening. It is not like anyone is even asking for new laws, just asking that the laws already on the books be enforced.

I am not being critical of you at all, my friend, I know 100% that you and I are on the same side, and we share in our hopes for these animals, so, please do not take this post that way. I do, however, believe this is a really good conversation to have, and an important one, perhaps if we can all put our collective heads together, we may be able to come up with some positive ideas, which could be helpful for all involved, humans and wild creatures alike. Such things can only come from people having a well intended conversation.

No offense taken whatsover, my friend. These are indeed very good conversations to have.

It is true that relocating the young male lion should have been informed by the location of the other lions in the reserve. I can't think of any plausible reason other than maybe relocating Marakele was just not feasible logistics and cost-wise so they still introduced the young male and hoped for the best. I honestly don't know.

I agree with you on letting Mother Nature taking the wheel as it is something I too have always strongly believed in and continue to believe in. However these smaller reserves require more pretty intensive management because they are isolated and thus large animals can't naturally disperse far and wide like in the Kruger, Okavango and Serengeti-Mara ecosystems. That's why translocations are necessary because leaving everything to Nature in this context would result in serious inbreeding. This is why wildlife corridors are so critical to long-term conservation, especially here in South Africa where most of our reserves are small and isolated. The only large connected wilderness areas here are Kruger, Kgalagadi (Kalahari) and the Limpopo Valley areas.

I also agree with you on the need to just enforce the existing laws for conservation because as it is the laws are solid on paper. Reply