There is a world somewhere between reality and fiction. Although ignored by many, it is very real and so are those living in it. This forum is about the natural world. Here, wild animals will be heard and respected. The forum offers a glimpse into an unknown world as well as a room with a view on the present and the future. Anyone able to speak on behalf of those living in the emerald forest and the deep blue sea is invited to join.
--- Peter Broekhuijsen ---

  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
How long Javan Tiger live in Java?

Indonesia P.T.Sondaica Offline
Regular Member
***
#1
( This post was last modified: 07-21-2017, 02:18 PM by Ngala Edit Reason: Appropriately renamed )

I have question how long javan tiger live in java
2 users Like P.T.Sondaica's post
Reply

Canada GrizzlyClaws Offline
Canine Expert
*****
Moderators
#2

I heard that the oldest tiger fossils from there was like over 1.6 mya.
2 users Like GrizzlyClaws's post
Reply

Indonesia P.T.Sondaica Offline
Regular Member
***
#3

(07-21-2017, 08:31 PM)GrizzlyClaws Wrote: I heard that the oldest tiger fossils from there was like over 1.6 mya.

I mean modern javan tiger...no ancient tiger thats not anchestor of modern java tiger
2 users Like P.T.Sondaica's post
Reply

tigerluver Offline
Feline Expert
*****
Moderators
#4

The Javan tiger can be considered a chronospecies of the tiger lineage of the Sunda shelf. Essentially, from the moment the island of Java came to be, the evolutionary forces caused by island isolation began shifting the ancestral P. t. soloensis into the modern Javan tiger. Modern Sunda shelf sea level were reached about 17,000 years ago. So give the ancestral tiger a few thousand years for evolution and you have your modern Javan tiger, more or less. So simply, a bit after the island of Java came to be.
3 users Like tigerluver's post
Reply

Indonesia P.T.Sondaica Offline
Regular Member
***
#5

(07-22-2017, 07:41 AM)tigerluver Wrote: The Javan tiger can be considered a chronospecies of the tiger lineage of the Sunda shelf. Essentially, from the moment the island of Java came to be, the evolutionary forces caused by island isolation began shifting the ancestral P. t. soloensis into the modern Javan tiger. Modern Sunda shelf sea level were reached about 17,000 years ago. So give the ancestral tiger a few thousand years for evolution and you have your modern Javan tiger, more or less. So simply, a bit after the island of Java came to be.

Thankyou so much sir...but i still dont understain 
This just 17.000 isolation will make a different subspesies indonesian(java bali sumatra)?i think a new subspesies will created 50.000 years isolation...
3 users Like P.T.Sondaica's post
Reply

tigerluver Offline
Feline Expert
*****
Moderators
#6

Island evolution happens quicker than evolution on the mainland as population are completely separated from each other. This results in no gene flow between the Java, Bali, and Sumatra populations which allows certain traits of the initial tigers that were trapped on each island to amplify rapidly in their progeny (this is called genetic drift and sometimes the founder effect). 

Nonetheless, your point is agreed upon by at least some scientists. Some have proposed that there are only two tiger subspecies today, the mainland tigers and the island (Sumatra, Java, Bali) tigers. Furthermore, regardless of what subspeciation method one agrees with, the Bali and Javan tiger are very similar thus the subspeciation differences are not as strong as say, between the Amur and Sumatran tiger.
2 users Like tigerluver's post
Reply

Indonesia P.T.Sondaica Offline
Regular Member
***
#7

(07-27-2017, 10:14 AM)tigerluver Wrote: Island evolution happens quicker than evolution on the mainland as population are completely separated from each other. This results in no gene flow between the Java, Bali, and Sumatra populations which allows certain traits of the initial tigers that were trapped on each island to amplify rapidly in their progeny (this is called genetic drift and sometimes the founder effect). 

Nonetheless, your point is agreed upon by at least some scientists. Some have proposed that there are only two tiger subspecies today, the mainland tigers and the island (Sumatra, Java, Bali) tigers. Furthermore, regardless of what subspeciation method one agrees with, the Bali and Javan tiger are very similar thus the subspeciation differences are not as strong as say, between the Amur and Sumatran tiger.

In google now still 9 subspecies...not 2
2 users Like P.T.Sondaica's post
Reply






Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

About Us
Go Social     Subscribe  

Welcome to WILDFACT forum, a website that focuses on sharing the joy that wildlife has on offer. We welcome all wildlife lovers to join us in sharing that joy. As a member you can share your research, knowledge and experience on animals with the community.
wildfact.com is intended to serve as an online resource for wildlife lovers of all skill levels from beginners to professionals and from all fields that belong to wildlife anyhow. Our focus area is wild animals from all over world. Content generated here will help showcase the work of wildlife experts and lovers to the world. We believe by the help of your informative article and content we will succeed to educate the world, how these beautiful animals are important to survival of all man kind.
Many thanks for visiting wildfact.com. We hope you will keep visiting wildfact regularly and will refer other members who have passion for wildlife.

Forum software by © MyBB