There is a world somewhere between reality and fiction. Although ignored by many, it is very real and so are those living in it. This forum is about the natural world. Here, wild animals will be heard and respected. The forum offers a glimpse into an unknown world as well as a room with a view on the present and the future. Anyone able to speak on behalf of those living in the emerald forest and the deep blue sea is invited to join.
--- Peter Broekhuijsen ---

  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Giant Short Faced Bear (Arctodus simus)

United States GrizzlyClaws Offline
Canine Expert
*****
Moderators
#14
( This post was last modified: 11-04-2019, 09:28 AM by GrizzlyClaws )

(11-04-2019, 04:08 AM)Roberto Wrote:
(11-03-2019, 11:07 PM)GrizzlyClaws Wrote: Ursus ingressus versus Actotherium angustidens is surely going to be an interesting matchup.

Since the former one got the longest recorded skull in the bear history at 57.14 cm, whereas the later one got shorter skull but maybe more robust and compact in comparison?

Maybe Arctotherium angustidens was anatomically built like its North American cousin which also possessed longer lanky limbs for the accustomization of roaming in the open grassland of South America.

well Ursus ingressus, which has now changed to Ursus kanivetz, was the most bearish of all bears. The cave bears were probably the most robust and strongest of any bear in history pound for pound. The cave bear definitely was a better grappler than Angustidens as it is proven that those less robust, long fragile back limbs of the short faced bears did not enable them to be good grapplers. But aside from all that, Angustidens was the largest bear in history and at max weights, taking into consideration that one 3500 lb specimen found in Buenos Aires, it could had been double the weight of the cave bear so that there would have enable it to definitely win.


If we take account about the specimen with the 57 cm skull, maybe it could manage to reduce the size gap with Arctotherium angustidens, and put a good fight against the larger opponent, although the larger SF bear would still likely end up as the victor.

About the robusticity, I'd say the Cave bear triumphs in the criteria like torso and limbs, and the SF bear got proportionally broader/shorter and more robust skull.
4 users Like GrizzlyClaws's post
Reply




Messages In This Thread
RE: Bear Size ~ - GrizzlyClaws - 11-03-2019, 11:07 PM
RE: Giant Short Faced Bear (Arctodus simus) - GrizzlyClaws - 11-04-2019, 09:23 AM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

About Us
Go Social     Subscribe  

Welcome to WILDFACT forum, a website that focuses on sharing the joy that wildlife has on offer. We welcome all wildlife lovers to join us in sharing that joy. As a member you can share your research, knowledge and experience on animals with the community.
wildfact.com is intended to serve as an online resource for wildlife lovers of all skill levels from beginners to professionals and from all fields that belong to wildlife anyhow. Our focus area is wild animals from all over world. Content generated here will help showcase the work of wildlife experts and lovers to the world. We believe by the help of your informative article and content we will succeed to educate the world, how these beautiful animals are important to survival of all man kind.
Many thanks for visiting wildfact.com. We hope you will keep visiting wildfact regularly and will refer other members who have passion for wildlife.

Forum software by © MyBB