There is a world somewhere between reality and fiction. Although ignored by many, it is very real and so are those living in it. This forum is about the natural world. Here, wild animals will be heard and respected. The forum offers a glimpse into an unknown world as well as a room with a view on the present and the future. Anyone able to speak on behalf of those living in the emerald forest and the deep blue sea is invited to join.
--- Peter Broekhuijsen ---

  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Comparing grappling ability of extant Ursids

Australia Verdugo Offline
Member
**
#6
( This post was last modified: 08-16-2024, 01:41 PM by Verdugo )

I posted these data with regards to Canines comparison between Polar bears and Brown bears on a different forum some times ago, will copy it here.

1. Canines:
See Per Christiansen (2008) Table 2 for data on the canines of several species of Ursid.
   
Here are some relevant comparisons that I would make:

a. Canines Crown Height: I use Canine Height / Skull Length to make body-size-adjusted crown height comparison
Polar Bear: 0.133
Brown Bear: 0.132

Summary: When body size is adjusted, the crown height of these two bears are comparable.

b. Canine Crown Bending Strength: I will compare bending strengths at two points, at the alveolus and at 45% of crown height.
I use the following calculation to make body size-adjusted canine bending strength:

Sml(Avl) * 10^4 / Skull Length^2: size-adjusted bending strength about medial-lateral axis at the alveolus.
I use squared Skull Length to adjust for square-cube law since strength values Sml and Sap are measured in mm^2. The 10^4 is added there to make the values not to 'decimal' (i hope that makes sense)

Polar Bear: 2.084
Brown Bear: 1.948

Sap(Avl) * 10^4 / Skull Length^2: size-adjusted bending strength about anterior-posterior axis at the alveolus.
Polar Bear: 1.515
Brown Bear: 1.335

Sml(45%) * 10^4 / Skull Length^2: size-adjusted bending strength about medial-lateral axis at 45% of crown height.
Polar Bear: 1.014
Brown Bear: 1.186


Sap(45%) * 10^4 / Skull Length^2: size-adjusted bending strength about anterior-posterior axis at 45% of crown height.
Polar Bear: 0.887
Brown Bear: 0.961

Summary: Polar Bear's canines are stronger proximally (at alveolus). Brown Bear's canines are stronger distally (at 45% of crown height). This is probably due to the fact polar bear's canines are thicker at the alveoli but then become sightly more tapered distally.

c. Canine Root Strength, determined by canine root surface area:
See Alejandro Pérez-Ramos et al (2018) Table 2.
   
The value Ca RA-sa is relevant to our purposes because it is size-adjusted.
Polar Bear 1: 0.40
Polar Bear 2: 0.43
Brown Bear: 0.38

Summary: when size is adjusted, Polar bears have thicker, an thus more reinforced canines root.
1 user Likes Verdugo's post
Reply




Messages In This Thread
RE: Comparing grappling ability of extant Ursids - Verdugo - 08-16-2024, 01:40 PM



Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

About Us
Go Social     Subscribe  

Welcome to WILDFACT forum, a website that focuses on sharing the joy that wildlife has on offer. We welcome all wildlife lovers to join us in sharing that joy. As a member you can share your research, knowledge and experience on animals with the community.
wildfact.com is intended to serve as an online resource for wildlife lovers of all skill levels from beginners to professionals and from all fields that belong to wildlife anyhow. Our focus area is wild animals from all over world. Content generated here will help showcase the work of wildlife experts and lovers to the world. We believe by the help of your informative article and content we will succeed to educate the world, how these beautiful animals are important to survival of all man kind.
Many thanks for visiting wildfact.com. We hope you will keep visiting wildfact regularly and will refer other members who have passion for wildlife.

Forum software by © MyBB