There is a world somewhere between reality and fiction. Although ignored by many, it is very real and so are those living in it. This forum is about the natural world. Here, wild animals will be heard and respected. The forum offers a glimpse into an unknown world as well as a room with a view on the present and the future. Anyone able to speak on behalf of those living in the emerald forest and the deep blue sea is invited to join.
(07-27-2020, 12:46 AM)Ashutosh Wrote: Still no evidence, just your opinion. If you have some measurements, then let us see it. Plus, Sundarbans is not the only mangrove system that tigers inhabited in the past. They were found in Bhitarkanika where they shared habitat with saltwater crocodiles (you can claim orinoco crocodiles are larger than the ones found in Bhitarkanika but that would be a waste of time). In fact all along the Bay of Bengal they interacted with saltwater crocodile which are much bigger than orinoco crocodile.
You're right that I lack the data regarding Sudarnbans salties because studies on them haven't been performed to determine average body mass or length, but based on my discussions with crocodile enthusiasts I have had in the past I was left under the impression that Sundarbans salties have been thought to be smaller than other populations. Now, if you disagree with that then perhaps we could see your data on them and the burden of proof would fall on you.
I'm also exclusively referring to the claim regarding the Sundarbans because that's the biome you mentioned, and even if those crocodiles aren't necessarily smaller (which I highly doubt), it doesn't take away from the fact that the claim that floodplains jaguars don't have to deal with comparable aquatic competitors to Sundarbans tigers is false.
I think it would be better if you think you can bring saltwater crocodiles size data from Sunderbans since you said they were small.
Also It would be better to see interspecific interactions between floodplain jaguars and Anaconda, Orinoco crocs and black caimans.