Bear Anatomy

[Shadow]

(12-10-2018, 03:01 AM)Panther Wrote:

(12-10-2018, 02:47 AM)Shadow Wrote: You haven´t yet showed real average of Kodiaks, that I disagree strongly. Charts you shared aren´t giving clear picture. First one is not good for comparisons, then another one had +6 year Kodiaks and+9 years from Alaska peninsula. Then you had one research from Yellowstone.

You have to do better if you use words like "real average". Now you use way too big words here compared to quality of information which you have shared.

Well, can I ask you why the first one is not good for comparisons? 
I already proven that it's not my cherry picked data, it's from a known respectable poster called "vodmeister". You can ask him the full study, but I guess he's not active right now.

And what's wrong with the second chart of 6+ year old individuals? 
I already showed the scientifical proof of male Brown bears reaching adult size at 6 years. And 6+ isn't equal to 6. It means more than 6 like 7, 8, 9,etc.. but starts from more than 6 year old specimen.
The Yellowstone research is the same one that gives second chart. 

I've done what I had to do. You disagreeing with a two different studies is way too much for anyone. Really. Maybe your personal feelings, but this is a public forum. 

The quality of the information I provided is fine. You have yet to prove otherwise. You disagreeing it by calling "random old charts" is really ridiculous. 
Also don't make it too lengthy with less subject, I mean use some data to back up your claims. Because it'll be easier to get a conclusion...

I gave some criticism and told already reason and reasoning. This is indeed public forum and all people looking this thread can check things I mentioned and reason why I am not convinced now. At this point really all relevant things have been said and also I don´t see any point to continue and go to some endless nonsense. If someone comes up with some new information, then of course interesting to discuss :) Reply