Bear Anatomy

[Shadow]

(12-10-2018, 01:13 AM)Panther Wrote:

(12-10-2018, 12:49 AM)Shadow Wrote: So you put here charts, but you don´t give any clear explanation what you are trying to tell with those. Ok. I called that first chart unreliable what comes to making comparisons because under chart was told so in same document.

No! Read the following quote of me..
https://wildfact.com/forum/topic-the-kin...9#pid63479

You can't call something unreliable without proving it. And it clearly not something I cherry picked to rise a random argument. It comes from a quality poster called "vodmeister". I believe most of the people here agrees with him. 

Also it's weird to see that I pinged him almost more than twice. But he still hasn't reacted.

I still don´t get your point here. Yes, polar bears are biggest bears what comes to size in average. But what are you now trying to say with these charts? 

Kodiak bears are commonly agreed to be the biggest subspecies of brown bears and biggest known individuals of brown bears are Kodiaks. Are you trying to prove that to be not true or what is your point? Or do you have any point here what you are trying to say? I am curious about your agenda here, that´s all.

Because if you try to say, that Kodiaks aren´t the biggest brown bears, then I wait some real reasoning and good information backing you up. That one chart isn´t good enough for such claim. I would ask this same from anyone making such claim. So is that your case or not? Reply