There is a world somewhere between reality and fiction. Although ignored by many, it is very real and so are those living in it. This forum is about the natural world. Here, wild animals will be heard and respected. The forum offers a glimpse into an unknown world as well as a room with a view on the present and the future. Anyone able to speak on behalf of those living in the emerald forest and the deep blue sea is invited to join.
(11-19-2014, 08:13 PM)'chaos' Wrote: From a fighting perspective, I'd go with a lighter, faster, more muscular and flexible version over the stronger, bulkier version.
Just my opinion. Sorry for being a bit off topic
Examples can be made for both sides of the coin. That being said, the two most dominate tigers of all time IMO, Waghdoh (the undeniable size king of his territory) and possibly the most dominate tiger ever and Munna a very large tiger but seems to be the same size as Red Eye, Patewala, Naak Kata, Kankata, Bhima, etc.
But these tigers are still close in size to others same. If you want to exagerate the differnces and compare a much smaller tiger or lion to a much larger 75kg + than the tides will undoubtedly be in the larger tigers favor.
Hence why Harbin Park has a King Tiger territory where it must keep its largest Siberians.
Amur and Kaziranga Tigers - Habitat and Prey Analysis
