About methods, measurements, errors, baits and the art of debating

[sanjay]

Thank you @GuateGojira and @WaveRiders . Internet is a boon for people who want to learn and share the knowledge so as a part of it we must respect it. Do not decrease the level of debate and discussion

From waverider -

Quote:The repeatedly fire of ICBMs between Guate and myself during the hopefully just finished first (and hopefully last) animal interforum thermonuclear war has left offences and insults on both grounds and over allies of both parts including you. Let’s forget them and leave them where they are as a testimony of the past for all of us to respect each other much more in the future. I feel Guate, peter and their party may share my thought and will hopefully very likely respect you from now onwards as much as you, and anybody else in general, deserve (which means in my opinion a lot of respect just to be clear).


I would suggest all of us from both parties to keep going supporting our own data, evidence, suggestions and interpretations on any matter without offences either naming or not naming the other part depending from when circumstances may suggest it could be a benefit of any reader to be aware that there are, or there might be, other interpretations, results or whatever on a particular matter. This to account for some room all of us may be not fully correct in our assessments and understandings of zoological matters. That should apply in any topics in my opinion and not only for morphometric measurements of extant and extinct carnivores, notoriously pretty much hot topics for most of us.


Anybody from WF feel free to copy this post of mine over there if retained useful.

Reply