Modern Weights and Measurements of Wild Lions

[AndresVida]

(02-28-2022, 11:28 PM)Pckts Wrote: You have a habit of making claims then not acknowledging those claims to be wrong, instead you just switch course quickly and make a new claim which takes the debate into another direction. 

For instance, your claim about Lions being empty as "not normal"

Perhaps he was referring to the fact that in many samples of weights recorded for lions in most cases the contents of the stomach have an influence on the value of the final value and perhaps for this reason he defined it as "normal" weight, as in many cases stomach content plays a role. 

Obviously this is just what I think to try to make some sense of what SpinoRex claimed here. 
It is obvious that his claim that "a weight derived by stomach content should be considered as normal" is completely wrong and way off in every sense.

The normal weight of an animal is the weight given solely and exclusively by the body mass of the animal between bones, muscles, organs and skin without any external body (such as food) affecting the value.

When we weigh a lion, we have to know the mass of THE LION. Not of the "lion + food". Hopefully he gets it.. Reply