There is a world somewhere between reality and fiction. Although ignored by many, it is very real and so are those living in it. This forum is about the natural world. Here, wild animals will be heard and respected. The forum offers a glimpse into an unknown world as well as a room with a view on the present and the future. Anyone able to speak on behalf of those living in the emerald forest and the deep blue sea is invited to join.
--- Peter Broekhuijsen ---

  • 1 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Modern Weights and Measurements of Leopards

Luipaard Offline
Leopard enthusiast
( This post was last modified: 01-26-2023, 03:26 AM by Luipaard )

(01-26-2023, 02:14 AM)Pckts Wrote:
(01-25-2023, 12:17 AM)Luipaard Wrote:
(01-24-2023, 11:26 PM)Pckts Wrote:
(01-24-2023, 03:41 AM)Luipaard Wrote:
(01-24-2023, 03:14 AM)Pckts Wrote:
(01-24-2023, 03:02 AM)Luipaard Wrote: @Pckts 

Do you realise that you're being a hypocrite at this point? You question everything despite what's being presented to you. From personal communications to official reports, you do not believe a single word from the persons who provide us exclusive information. But as expected for jaguars there are different standards. Tell me, what's the difference between a voice message and an Instagram message? Because Iman Mermarian sent three members of this forum the same info and still you do not deem it reliable but an Instagram message from a biologist saying a jaguar weighs "about" 110kg is good enough all of a sudden? You are not playing this game fair and square.





Lets try this one last time...
No one has presented a single shred of evidence for a 115kg Leopard. Who was there, who weighed him, when was he weighed, what were his measurements? etc.
 The only weight mentioned is 95kg so what is the issue?
Not to mention this specific Leopard has had controversy left and right with multiple weights claimed and thrown away. 
In regards to the Biologist, he literally is on video discussing the capture the and measurements of Joker, Oncafari has provided actual capture data and measurements. Where as Iman has provided nothing that's comparable. 

You use fan made tables on skull measurements and 2nd hand Persian leopard measurements with no clarification what weights exist or where they came from yet question anything to do with verified Jaguar data. 
The only hypocrite I see is you.

Quote:Lets try this one last time...
No one has presented a single shred of evidence for a 115kg Leopard. Who was there, who weighed him, when was he weighed, what were his measurements? etc.
 The only weight mentioned is 95kg so what is the issue?

The issue is that you doubt the 95kg figure even after seeing the official report. What more can you ask bar body measurements? Who was there during the weighing of the cat? Iman Memarian, hence why he told us he weighed that much initially and why he's mentioned in the study. The only thing you lack are body measurements, but for jaguars you don't seem to require them hence jaguar 'Mango' being accepted immediately to the infamous table.

Quote:Not to mention this specific Leopard has had controversy left and right with multiple weights claimed and thrown away.

So did Lopez the outlier jaguar who was added twice to the infamous table at one point?

Quote:In regards to the Biologist, he literally is on video discussing the capture the and measurements of Joker, Oncafari has provided actual capture data and measurements. Where as Iman has provided nothing that's comparable.

Iman Memarian has provided his weight (around the time of his euthanasia) alongside two professors. Again this is not enough for you to be reliable but a video or an Instagram message is for jaguars.

Quote:You use fan made tables on skull measurements and 2nd hand Persian leopard measurements with no clarification what weights exist or where they came from yet question anything to do with verified Jaguar data.
The only hypocrite I see is you.

First of all, the "fan made" table contains data from scientific sources exclusively. The jaguar table contains weights from all sort of sources. After all an estimated weight is enough for you to be added to said table (i.e. Mango weighing "around" 110kg).

Very verified I must say.
Quote:The issue is that you doubt the 95kg figure even after seeing the official report. What more can you ask bar body measurements? Who was there during the weighing of the cat? Iman Memarian, hence why he told us he weighed that much initially and why he's mentioned in the study. The only thing you lack are body measurements, but for jaguars you don't seem to require them hence jaguar 'Mango' being accepted immediately to the infamous table.

How about clarification when said Leopard actually weighed 95kg or 115kg or 98kg? How about the weighing procedure, scale used, body measurements, etc.
It's not that difficult. You have multiple claims, without corresponding valid information. 

Mango is simple posted from what the Biologist involved in his capture and collaring stated. You know, the same biologist on video discussing measurements and capture dates and providing those details in public. 

Whether you accept them or not means nothing especially when you post trophy hunter FB posts with no verification for Leopards weighing 80kgs.  

Quote:So did Lopez the outlier jaguar who was added twice to the infamous table at one point?
When was this? When they first made the table and was quickly corrected? 
Meanwhile the same table you use over and over again for Persian Leopards is 2nd sources and you can't even provide the identities of any Leopard mentioned at a weight of 90kgs. Or you using species specific general weights as individuals? 

Quote:Iman Memarian has provided his weight (around the time of his euthanasia) alongside two professors. Again this is not enough for you to be reliable but a video or an Instagram message is for jaguars.
No, just him. And the weight''s'' are all over the board. 3-4 of which he wasn't there for not to  mention one of which that's an "estimated" weight without clarification on when which came and from whom. 
And again your excuses for the Jaguar weights which come from the capture team with data and video/images of the exact capture compared to you using FB trophy hunter claims or trying to 2nd hand weights without knowing where they came from hold no weight. 
You don't seem to realize how poorly these excuses are representing you.


Quote:First of all, the "fan made" table contains data from scientific sources exclusively. The jaguar table contains weights from all sort of sources. After all an estimated weight is enough for you to be added to said table (i.e. Mango weighing "around" 110kg).
 
You mean 2nd hand sources? 
From which you have no clue corresponding captures, weights, measurements, specific details that go along with them compared to all of those data specifics mentioned with the Jaguars. 
And again you use this same excuse you used the last 3 paragraphs meanwhile it holds no truth and only highlights your hypocrisy on the matter.

Quote:How about clarification when said Leopard actually weighed 95kg or 115kg or 98kg? How about the weighing procedure, scale used, body measurements, etc.
It's not that difficult. You have multiple claims, without corresponding valid information. 

You do realise this is a different situation than the Pantanal jaguars being collared? One was brought in (being weighed among other things) for a life-saving operation whereas the latter are being weighed as a protocol when collaring. You demand all kind of things that are not important for the people involved in this case. Be grateful the wildlife veterinarian kindly answered us and that the official report has been presented to you. The report is signed by him and two professors, it's as valid as it gets.

Quote:Mango is simple posted from what the Biologist involved in his capture and collaring stated. You know, the same biologist on video discussing measurements and capture dates and providing those details in public.

You said he's a new individual to be added to the table, meaning you readily accept the weight without knowing "weighing procedure, scale used, body measurements, etc.". It's via an Instagram message which is no different than the voice messages Iman Memarian sent us and surely not more valid than the official report of the Persian leopard. The fact that we lack body measurements or info about the scale (why even?) doesn't change that. Those are just criteria of yours.

Quote:Whether you accept them or not means nothing especially when you post trophy hunter FB posts with no verification for Leopards weighing 80kgs.

When did I post "trophy hunter FB posts"?

Quote:When was this? When they first made the table and was quickly corrected? 

Does it matter when it occurred? It happened so "multiple weights were claimed". 

Quote:Meanwhile the same table you use over and over again for Persian Leopards is 2nd sources and you can't even provide the identities of any Leopard mentioned at a weight of 90kgs. Or you using species specific general weights as individuals?

We don't know how they obtained the weights, I'm sure they can provide the identity of each and every individual but that wasn't their aim. All they wanted to publish was an overview of Persian leopard weights.

Quote:No, just him. And the weight''s'' are all over the board. 3-4 of which he wasn't there for not to  mention one of which that's an "estimated" weight without clarification on when which came and from whom.

How do you conclude he wasn't there? There are photos of him being present = evidence. Excuse after excuse again; you doubt the scale capacity, the scale's presence, Iman Memarian's presence, if the weight is estimated or not, ... The list goes on. Nothing convinces you, not even an official report.

Quote:And again your excuses for the Jaguar weights which come from the capture team with data and video/images of the exact capture compared to you using FB trophy hunter claims or trying to 2nd hand weights without knowing where they came from hold no weight. 
You don't seem to realize how poorly these excuses are representing you.

There's the "FB trophy hunter" mention again. When did I post a "FB trophy hunted leopard"?

The person with lots of excuses at his disposal is you. Remember Instagram message > official report according to you.

Quote:You mean 2nd hand sources? 
From which you have no clue corresponding captures, weights, measurements, specific details that go along with them compared to all of those data specifics mentioned with the Jaguars. 
And again you use this same excuse you used the last 3 paragraphs meanwhile it holds no truth and only highlights your hypocrisy on the matter.

There are detailed measurements for some skulls (e.g. Van Neer's 2013 study) meaning they measured the skulls themselves. In their case they collected skulls from two Belgian museums. There's nothing "2nd hand" about them. Again you demand a lot of info because that's your criteria. Luckily you don't decide the requirements of a first-hand source.
Quote:You do realise this is a different situation than the Pantanal jaguars being collared? One was brought in (being weighed among other things) for a life-saving operation whereas the latter are being weighed as a protocol when collaring. You demand all kind of things that are not important for the people involved in this case. Be grateful the wildlife veterinarian kindly answered us and that the official report has been presented to you. The report is signed by him and two professors, it's as valid as it gets.

You do realize that this cat was captured no differently and claims were made. Yet no clarification or proof of said claims have been presented. 
You also interpreting a report means little, we've already seen numerous members here try to do the same on post mortem reports only to get in trouble for making assumptions. 

Quote:You said he's a new individual to be added to the table, meaning you readily accept the weight without knowing "weighing procedure, scale used, body measurements, etc.". It's via an Instagram message which is no different than the voice messages Iman Memarian sent us and surely not more valid than the official report of the Persian leopard. The fact that we lack body measurements or info about the scale (why even?) doesn't change that. Those are just criteria of yours.
What are you not understanding? The same person who weighed and presented Jokers measurements also presented Mangos. You know, the one who provided actual capture dates and corresponding body measurements and weighing protocols.  
Nice try though
Quote:When did I post "trophy hunter FB posts"?
Literally the Tanzanian Leopard hanging from the scale is a FB trophy hunter post. The weight claims mean nothing as they will load the cats with weights or have faulty scales.

Quote:Does it matter when it occurred? It happened so "multiple weights were claimed". 
 
Of course it does if they're actively updating a table or else you're left with errors like what happened with the persian table. The fact that you don't seem to understand this or acknowledge it says a lot. 
Quote:How do you conclude he wasn't there? There are photos of him being present = evidence. Excuse after excuse again; you doubt the scale capacity, the scale's presence, Iman Memarian's presence, if the weight is estimated or not, ... The list goes on. Nothing convinces you, not even an official report
Which weighing was he there for? The 115kg? The 98kg? The about 100kg? The 95kg? Or maybe it has to do with the fact that he doesn't have the measurements or capture data and needs to be told what publication they are from? 
Once again, the amount of excuses you try and make for the Jaguar table on being invalid while accepting weights without any actual data or proof for persian leopards is astounding. 
Quote:There are detailed measurements for some skulls (e.g. Van Neer's 2013 study) meaning they measured the skulls themselves. In their case they collected skulls from two Belgian museums. There's nothing "2nd hand" about them. Again you demand a lot of info because that's your criteria. Luckily you don't decide the requirements of a first-hand source.

I'm not sure you know what 2nd hand means?
Van Neer wasn't present during the capture of these cats. They are by definition 2nd hand *belonged to someone else*

Quote:You do realize that this cat was captured no differently and claims were made. Yet no clarification or proof of said claims have been presented. 
You also interpreting a report means little, we've already seen numerous members here try to do the same on post mortem reports only to get in trouble for making assumptions. 

You do realise the proof is right there in front of you, backing Iman Memarian's claims (hint: report).

I'm not sure what you're talking about regarding post mortem reports but in this case we're dealing with a live cat although they were about to put it out of its misery.

Quote:What are you not understanding? The same person who weighed and presented Jokers measurements also presented Mangos. You know, the one who provided actual capture dates and corresponding body measurements and weighing protocols.  
Nice try though

Why don't you share everything about 'Mango' instead of an "about X-"weight. And give me "weighing procedure, scale used, body measurements, etc." of outlier male Lopez. Those are your own criteria so you should be able to right?

Quote:Literally the Tanzanian Leopard hanging from the scale is a FB trophy hunter post. The weight claims mean nothing as they will load the cats with weights or have faulty scales.

I had a sneaky suspicion you were talking about that male. I actually received it from a professional hunter active in Central African Republic. He got it directly from a client in Tanzania. He's actually going to Masailand after the current season. The only reason I shared it is because of the scale which 'verifies' the weight. I know it's not 100% certain this weight is accurate but doesn't his size and full belly make it somewhat believable?

Quote:Of course it does if they're actively updating a table or else you're left with errors like what happened with the persian table. The fact that you don't seem to understand this or acknowledge it says a lot. 

Lopez' being added twice isn't the only error. I have more remarks which I already addressed but I'm still waiting for answers. Feel free to PM me when you have some answers since it's off-topic here.

Quote:Which weighing was he there for? The 115kg? The 98kg? The about 100kg? The 95kg? Or maybe it has to do with the fact that he doesn't have the measurements or capture data and needs to be told what publication they are from? 
Once again, the amount of excuses you try and make for the Jaguar table on being invalid while accepting weights without any actual data or proof for persian leopards is astounding. 

Well you doubted his presence overall despite him appearing in almost every photo. He's a wildlife veterinarian which makes me assume he was there almost the whole time since he's involved in rescuing the cat. The 2014 study mentioned the exceptional male's weight with Iman Memarian as the source (i.e. personal communication). I contacted him and he said the same thing to me. You and AndresVida did too and again received the same information. Now there's an offical report where the decision or proposal is made to euthanize the cat, meaning nothing life-saving can be done. At this point he weighed 95kg.

You questioning the official report signed by Memarian and two more professors with no reason is what I call astounding.

Quote:I'm not sure you know what 2nd hand means?
Van Neer wasn't present during the capture of these cats. They are by definition 2nd hand *belonged to someone else*

Again, they measured the skulls themselves . They borrowed the skulls from two Belgian museums who did not measure them. The measurements are therefore from a first-hand source.
2 users Like Luipaard's post
Reply




Messages In This Thread
RE: Modern Weights and Measurements of Leopards - Luipaard - 01-26-2023, 03:25 AM



Users browsing this thread:
3 Guest(s)

About Us
Go Social     Subscribe  

Welcome to WILDFACT forum, a website that focuses on sharing the joy that wildlife has on offer. We welcome all wildlife lovers to join us in sharing that joy. As a member you can share your research, knowledge and experience on animals with the community.
wildfact.com is intended to serve as an online resource for wildlife lovers of all skill levels from beginners to professionals and from all fields that belong to wildlife anyhow. Our focus area is wild animals from all over world. Content generated here will help showcase the work of wildlife experts and lovers to the world. We believe by the help of your informative article and content we will succeed to educate the world, how these beautiful animals are important to survival of all man kind.
Many thanks for visiting wildfact.com. We hope you will keep visiting wildfact regularly and will refer other members who have passion for wildlife.

Forum software by © MyBB