Modern weights and measurements on wild tigers

[LonePredator]

(10-09-2022, 09:22 PM)Pantherinae Wrote:

(10-09-2022, 09:13 PM)LonePredator Wrote:

(10-09-2022, 09:08 PM)Pantherinae Wrote:

(10-09-2022, 07:49 PM)Pckts Wrote:

(10-09-2022, 06:43 PM)GreenForest Wrote: The T24's picture posted by @LonePredator  was from his last capture. The one posted by @Pckts was from one of his previous capture. Just FYI.

As for Wagdoh, "For the last 15 days, the old tiger was found moving sluggishly and had virtually given up on life." (http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/artic...751857.cms) Most likely wagdoh didn't eat much in last few days of his death. If at all we have to subtract food content, then it will be 10-15kg. Nothing more. 255-260kg empty weight will put wagdoh as heaviest old aged wild bigcat in scientific records.

Time stamps from the captures showing different dates?
Or source?

Both have the same stretcher.



Wagdoh became a cattle killer after being dispatched for a few years before death and most likely was killing them prior as well.
He also was said to have killed a person recently before
His death.

*This image is copyright of its original author

Great info Pckts, really makes you wonder about cattle killers. Just like the Kenyan 272 kg male lion that had a smaller frame, Wagdoh could have a lot of fat on him. Which makes way more sense when you look at Wagdoh’s measurments imo. 

Knock said the lion appared fit like a wild lion, nothing like a zoo animal, but later it was said the lion was full of fat… Wagdoh also looked fine, but probably had decent amount of fat.

208cm HBL in straight line is very large. It’s not small by any means.

Do we know if it was taken in a straight line? If he was bloated and it was taken over the curves it could have been highly exaggerated. 

Yes his HB length is fine, but I’m still puzzled by the weight looking at his height and chest measurments.

Because 208cm in straight line matches very well with his weight. And like I have already said ten times before in this discussion, chest girth does not correlate with weight as well as bodylength does and shoulder height barely causes any difference.

Tigerluver presented a regression which also showed that chest girth has low correlation with weight compared to bodylength (which has the best correlation)

Bodylength is the primary factor for high weight. Chest girth is secondary and shoulder height is insignificant. Reply