Modern weights and measurements on wild tigers

[LonePredator]

(10-07-2022, 07:52 PM)Pckts Wrote:

(10-07-2022, 07:30 PM)abhisingh7 Wrote:

(10-07-2022, 07:22 PM)Pckts Wrote:

(10-07-2022, 07:17 PM)Kk LonePredator Wrote:

(10-07-2022, 07:03 PM)Pckts Wrote: Here is a comparable male in all departments

*This image is copyright of its original author

213cm in HBL but taken over curves so around 208cm in a straight line.
His chest girth is 140cm *4 cm* larger than Wagdoh 

Shoulder height unknown but it’s safe to say it’s going to be at least as tall as Wagdoh since he wasn’t a very tall Tiger.

This males weight was 546lbs or 247 kgs.

213cm over the curves would mean 200-203 cm in straight which totally adds up with the weight of 247kg.

And like I have already stated, chest girth does not correlate with weight as much as bodylength does and also the fact that Wagdoh was so old his chest girth would have shrunk due to old age.

No it wouldn’t, generally you’ll see anywhere from 2-4” difference between the two. So assuming they both are fairly close in length, Wagdoh is outsized in chest and most likely shoulder. And Branders 600lb Tiger significantly outsized him in every department 

*This image is copyright of its original author

bro brander didn't weighted this giant although , he had estimated it no less than 600lbs roughly .

Not “no less” but “was about”

*This image is copyright of its original author

Still the fact is that this Tiger was never weighed on a scale. You can’t use this to prove anything in this case. Reply