Modern weights and measurements on wild tigers

[LonePredator]

(07-18-2022, 02:31 PM)GreenForest Wrote:

(07-18-2022, 03:50 AM)Khan85 Wrote:

(07-18-2022, 03:21 AM)GreenForest Wrote:

(07-13-2022, 01:18 AM)Khan85 Wrote: Some large tigers of 21st century.

Wikipedia weights, newspaper weights are not reliable. Only peer reviewed, published weights are reliable. Other than nepal chitwan, panna, nagarhole tiger weights, others in your list are not reliable.

Verified by contacting vets/researchers/Forest Department people present on site so yes they are reliable. You want to believe it or not, that's up to you.

We know for sure some of these tigers were weighed and reliable. But for others, you have to provide sources from where you get this. So that others can cross verify that. I am fairly certain that T24 weight from wikipedia is false. Yet, some people continue to use false weights. Few other weights are based on guesswork. Onus is upon you for the sake of truthfulness and clarity.

What's reliable and what's not can be very subjective at times. Why would you have a problem if two parallel records are compiled with one being strict and the other being linient? Reply