Modern weights and measurements on wild tigers

[Rishi]

Just FYI any comparison posts here will be deleted. There's seperate thread for that.

(09-25-2020, 08:02 AM)Yusuf Wrote: Personally i used Mazak to prove that experts cant know the real weight of a male tiger. He described the male sibirian tiger as 230 kg on average whcih sint correct. There are even 120 kg lions described as healthy and adult. Anyways the datas on tigers are not really good. We have more datas for the tiger than for the lion but they arent really good. With good i mean datas with big sample size. 100% Conclusive datas for tigers are in my opinions Brander, Behar and maybe Hewett and that was it. Other datas are only reports and datas with small sampe sizes.

Best regards

And @GuateGojira im still waiting for a answer via privat message. I dont want to debate or something. I only corrected your method to get the average for lions and tigers that was it.

M8 personal opinions are not facts. WII may not released the data in public, but their sample size is in thousands... You'd know that if you were familiar with their extent of fieldwork. It dwarfs any personal venture of any independent scientist.
Guys like Yadavendra Jhala or Wasif Jamshed who represent them & speaks based on that data.

If you take my advice & check old posts, you'll see here alone we have more than hundred animal's data (mostly dead, captured or translocated) from just news in past few year. And for majority cases we only have photos of the animals being weighed but couldn't find which WII representative had the data.

(09-25-2020, 10:38 AM)GuateGojira Wrote: Why are you challenge me? What is your porpuse here? Who send you?

I am wasting to much time with you and your crazy conclutions. If you try to prove that lions are bigger or if you try to create problems trying to drag the "vs" debate to this forum, you are wasting your time.

He seems to be claiming something like equal weight individuals of both species don't have of equal size & dimensions... Also that you're overestimating by taking into account newer sources instead of only 50-year-old ones. Reply