Tyrannosaurus rex

[Spalea]

@DinoFan83 :

I repeat you at #195: " Considering all this, I see absolutely no reason to think Tyrannosaurus was the largest carnivorous dinosaur ever discovered seeing as based on all of this, Spinosaurus, Giganotosaurus, Mapusaurus, and Carcharodontosaurus all appear to have been SUBSTANTIALLY heavier. "

And you, speaking about the " aforementioned carcharodontosaurids " at #197 : " What I said was that Tyrannosaurus was more robust than they were, which can be true whether or not Tyrannosaurus happened to be smaller or larger. "


T-rex wasn't the longest but the most robust, right ? Thus, if carcharodontosaurus, gigatonosaurus and mapusaurus were indeed a little bit more longer than the T-rex, it's impossible they were substantially heavier given their more slender bones structure.

CQFD as we say in french language... What it needed to be demonstrated. When we don't stop to see photos demonstrating T-rex had the most robust bones structure among the big dinosaur predators on land on this by far, no use henceforth to pick here and there some figures enabling to proove the opposite. The carcharodontosaurids couldn't be substantially heaver than the t-rex, because they were only a little bit larger. And because we were going to speak about beast of the same family (Carnosaurids), thus your analogy, at #197 too, with the triceratops's and antarctosaurus's femurs is completely irrelevant. Reply