Tigers of Central India

[Pckts]

(06-28-2017, 02:35 AM)Roflcopters Wrote: I would have to look hard to find the tall part about Munna and honestly i just don't see it. Bheema, I can clearly see it. no doubt about it and you are right, Umarpani and Kf were indeed very similar in their build and Kf was probably the heavier out of the two with a larger chest girth but again. bigger tigers don't always win. Raja and Munna both have proved that over the years.

Just to give you perspective, Munna is the same height as wagdoh as well and bheema allegedly is the same height as both but wagdoh was longer and thicker. Mutkasur is the same size as katezari, a little larger than Shivaji was apparently and both are similar to the male I saw, sangam, who's similar to Munna. I have also read bheema was tallest, so who knows. Haha
Tigers are very stocky animals, especially the way they carry their heads and their thick bodies make it even more noticeable.
All of this is based of my collection of guides I spoke with who've seen both or individually. My favorite response was from one Kanha guide and he said that all Kanha tigers were large and it's very hard to tell which is actually larger. I though that response was the most likely. Reply