|
Size comparisons
|
 (12-13-2019, 09:37 PM)DinoFan83 Wrote: Not so 'kingly' after all! Sue is closer to 9 tons as I and countless others have told you multiple times now it's strange you can post the exact weights for most animals such as your oversized Mapusaurus (you have been told multiple times now how with the current fossil evidence we have it's unlikely that the largest Mapusaurus specimen is over 13 meters and its closer to 12.2 to 12.6 m)but when it comes to Sue you can never put the exact weight such as 8400 kg if its Hartmans old Sue or 8830 kg if you go by Franoys. stop ignoring information because you don't like it. Also, you have been told here before there is no need for descriptions like the one you have posted here. It's childish and it also shows you have an issue with the animal (whether you want to admit it or not) Stop downplaying Tyrannosaurus just because you have a bias against the animal these are the exact reasons why so many people get angry at you and why you have been stopped from being able to post anywhere on the discord apart from the shitpost server. No one here downplays Carnosaurs or sauropods because it's childish. Stop ignoring people because you do not like what they have to say especially when they are using the most current data to support what they are saying. Anything you have to say regarding Tyrannosaurus should be taken with a grain of salt because you have a reputation of downplaying the animal. |
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 7 Guest(s) |