There is a world somewhere between reality and fiction. Although ignored by many, it is very real and so are those living in it. This forum is about the natural world. Here, wild animals will be heard and respected. The forum offers a glimpse into an unknown world as well as a room with a view on the present and the future. Anyone able to speak on behalf of those living in the emerald forest and the deep blue sea is invited to join.
--- Peter Broekhuijsen ---

Poll: Who is the largest tiger?
Amur tiger
Bengal tiger
They are equal
[Show Results]
 
 
  • 3 Vote(s) - 3.33 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Who is the "king" of tigers? - Bengal or Amur

Indonesia WaveRiders Offline
Member
**

tigerluver
 
That is absolutely true but I did not want to complicate the matter too much. I remember in 2004 in AVA I estimated similar figures speculating also on faecal rate, average faecal mass, fluid mass flow (water in and urine out) and so on arriving at figures of 215 kg and 128 kg for adult males and females respectively, but there were included also some different assumptions. It has past a long time since then and I am getting old for those kind of elaborated speculations. My purpose was to refine empty stomach body mass differentiating the data from Sunquist (1981) and Smith et al. (1983) for adult males and adult females.
 
 
BTW
Errata-Corrige: Average food intake in the first 24 hours 17,7 kg
 
As a further mathematical exercise I considered the body mass of each individual instead of the sex/age class weigh to get collectively the average 14,0 kg of food intake in the first 24 hours and I obtained slightly different results as follows
 
Adult males : average body mass at empty stomach 217,0 kg (heaviest 241,5 kg again following Kleiber’s Law)
Average food intake in the first 24 hours 18,0 kg
 
Adult females : average body mass at empty stomach 127,9 kg (heaviest pregnant 150,4 kg / non-pregnant 140,1 kg adult female again following Kleiber’s Law)
Average food intake in the first 24 hours 12,1 kg
 
 
Pckts

How can you compare the Smuts sample of Kruger lion weights all corrected for stomach contents with Chitawan tiger weight sample where the capturing technique implicated an almost certain 12/18 hours of feeding in the very most if not all cases before the weighing operation and no estimated stomach contents was accounted? Mine is therefore an attempt to account for the statistical impact of any likely stomach contents in the sample based on info on capturing technique, ecology data and any biology consideration that can help to refine the estimates. It is up to each one to use actual data or data modified in the most sensible way. It depends from the contest and from the consistency with other data when doing comparisons and other statistical analyses.


                  WaveRiders
 

 
2 users Like WaveRiders's post
Reply




Messages In This Thread
RE: Who is the "King" of the tigers? - WaveRiders - 02-05-2015, 01:00 AM



Users browsing this thread:
4 Guest(s)

About Us
Go Social     Subscribe  

Welcome to WILDFACT forum, a website that focuses on sharing the joy that wildlife has on offer. We welcome all wildlife lovers to join us in sharing that joy. As a member you can share your research, knowledge and experience on animals with the community.
wildfact.com is intended to serve as an online resource for wildlife lovers of all skill levels from beginners to professionals and from all fields that belong to wildlife anyhow. Our focus area is wild animals from all over world. Content generated here will help showcase the work of wildlife experts and lovers to the world. We believe by the help of your informative article and content we will succeed to educate the world, how these beautiful animals are important to survival of all man kind.
Many thanks for visiting wildfact.com. We hope you will keep visiting wildfact regularly and will refer other members who have passion for wildlife.

Forum software by © MyBB