Register
There is a world somewhere between reality and fiction. Although ignored by many, it is very real and so are those living in it. This forum is about the natural world. Here, wild animals will be heard and respected. The forum offers a glimpse into an unknown world as well as a room with a view on the present and the future. Anyone able to speak on behalf of those living in the emerald forest and the deep blue sea is invited to join.
--- Peter Broekhuijsen ---
WildFact › Information Section › Terrestrial Wild Animals › Wild Cats › Tiger v
Who is the "king" of tigers? - Bengal or Amur

Poll: Who is the largest tiger?
Amur tiger
Bengal tiger
They are equal
[Show Results]
 
 
  • 3 Vote(s) - 3.33 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Options
Who is the "king" of tigers? - Bengal or Amur

Sri Lanka Apollo Away
Bigcat Enthusiast
*****
3,028 Replies
9 Topics
Joined: Apr 2014
Reputation: 15
#103
05-12-2014, 04:00 PM

(05-12-2014, 10:03 AM)'Richardrli' Wrote:
(05-12-2014, 09:51 AM)'GuateGojira' Wrote: That will be interesting Pckts. However I need to mention a little fact. Until 1968, the tigers from Indochina and Malaysia were also classified as "Bengals". It is possible, if not completely certain, that many of the old "small" Bengals were in fact Indochinese or Malayan tigers. It is important to take this in count in old comparisons.
 


 
That's interesting Guate, can I ask for the source? Thanks


 

 



Credits to Guate

"The Indochinese tiger was not considered a separate subspecies UNTIL 1968, when Dr. Mazak spend several months studying a captive tiger from Vietnam and many skulls, then he conclude that there were enough differences for put it in a new subspecies, which had been proved right with the studies of Lou et al.
My sources were the document of Mazak and the book "Riding the Tiger"."


"* Kitchener said that are three subspecies:
1. Land tiger: From Amur to Indochina, taking India.
2. Island tiger: Sonda islands.
3. Caspian tiger.

However the NEW GENETIC STUDIES maded by Lou et al. shows that there are enough genetic differences between the Bengal (tigris), Indochinese (corbetti), South china (amoyensis) and Amur tiger (altaica), and that the Sumatran tiger could be even a COMPLETE different species. By the way, the Javan and the Bali "tigers" could be a new species to, with the Javan tiger like "Panthera sondaica sondaica" and the Bali like "Panthera sondaica balica".

Finally, the Caspian tiger was just the western population of the Amur tiger, so Kitchener was completely wrong, sorry for him.

About the size, the Indochinese is smaller than the Bengal tiger, this is a fact know since Pocock (1939) and Mazak (1976)"
 
1 user Likes Apollo's post
Reply




Messages In This Thread
RE: Who is the "King" of the tigers? - Apollo - 05-12-2014, 04:00 PM



Users browsing this thread:
3 Guest(s)

About Us
Go Social     Subscribe  

Welcome to WILDFACT forum, a website that focuses on sharing the joy that wildlife has on offer. We welcome all wildlife lovers to join us in sharing that joy. As a member you can share your research, knowledge and experience on animals with the community.
wildfact.com is intended to serve as an online resource for wildlife lovers of all skill levels from beginners to professionals and from all fields that belong to wildlife anyhow. Our focus area is wild animals from all over world. Content generated here will help showcase the work of wildlife experts and lovers to the world. We believe by the help of your informative article and content we will succeed to educate the world, how these beautiful animals are important to survival of all man kind.
Many thanks for visiting wildfact.com. We hope you will keep visiting wildfact regularly and will refer other members who have passion for wildlife.

Forum software by © MyBB