Impressive Females

[Pckts]

So no Tuli Leopard weights.
The Anderson Male was absolutely dwarfed, it's easy to see when you look at the Lioness' head, neck and chest portion compared to the Anderson male, shes much, much larger than him.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pwxukOXPNUg

Showing a photo of a leopard many meters off which looks small is exactly what I'm speaking about.
Pantanal Skulls are much larger than any leopard skulls, do one or 2 freak leopard skulls come close, sure but still are smaller than the average pantanal skull and much smaller when comparing top tier to top tier.

Lastly is the scale, numerous things that are noticeable...

1 is the man is hunched over and his foot is lower than the mirror as well.
2 is the location, which is obviously different 
3 is the angle of the photos which is obviously different as well. 
4 is you dont know the height of the man

Even if all things were equal, that Leopard would be no more than upper knee high which is not unusual.

So based off camera trap photo's and videos only, which is all you have, in no way do these leopards look larger in frame but the males are  robust while the females look normal. We already know that they have 40kg individuals which are small, I'm not saying all are small but its not something to just be swept away. Lastly is that none I've seen are some unique giant, there frame is no different and I've seen just as robust males in e. And s. Africa but ive been able to see many photos and videos or in person to compare while these Leopards have 0 to compare other than hunting photos or camera traps... or the 2 photos taken by camera many meters off. 

So that being said, you and I will not be agreeing here and that's ok. Reply