Eyes on or hands on? A discussion of human interference

[Pckts]

And do I need to go through the amount of camera traps that are being used now, again?
Its weird how I post tons of accounts and you respond to none of them.
You have the idea that "if a few die, they die" as long as most survive. 
That is the opposite of conservation, and since camera traps, gps, radar, sonar etc. All provide far better data than camera traps could ever do. Hence why they are the most commonly used technology in monitoring wild animals. 

http://news.mongabay.com/news-index/came...ping1.html

http://www.siliconcitynews.com/?p=16497

another MASSIVE list of animals monitored by Camera traps from the WWF
http://www.wwfindia.org/?7322/Camera-tra...ross-India

Im sure you will simply disregard these, but this debate is done.
Animals die during camera trapping, tigers die, get stressed, loose weight, get infections, etc.
Whether its 5% or 100%, it doesn't matter... Its too much!
Camera traps provide more info than a radio collar ever will. Monitoring a single individual is meaningless, camera traps can do the same yet provide information on the entire land scape. Hence why they are used far more, and successfully. Reply