Eyes on or hands on? A discussion of human interference

[Pckts]

(12-12-2014, 10:45 AM)'GuateGojira' Wrote: That is EXACTLY what I am saying many times: the method is good and useful, the problem is the people that use it.

However, Pctks and "others" are so closed in they mind that simple choose to reject everything, instead of see the full context of the situation.

I am convinced that the radiocollaring in Kanha is wrong, as they are not been captured for scientific purposes (not a single study has been published) but only for tourism. However, this doesn't mean that the studies in Nepal and several other places are also wrong.

Sadly, I am also convinced that Pckts is not going to change his mind, and that is, I am afraid, a dead end.
 

 

"closed mind"
Because we want to stop stressing out wild animals, killing them for information that can easily be obtained through less stressful means. This is already proven and I am still waiting for any information that can benefit a Tiger via radio collar that cannot be retrived through camera traps. 
Examples would be appreciated, please note, using migratory examples are not new and have already been monitored via camera traps. So outside of located a individual tiger for viewing or testing, what benefit can be gained through them that cannot be gained through camera traps, drones, photographers etc. Reply