Eyes on or hands on? A discussion of human interference

[Pckts]

(11-05-2014, 09:31 PM)'sanjay' Wrote: Relax, Guate -
I already told you not to waste your time on this.

You have lost lot of time in this debate, You may have created good thread and some good blog.

Sometime ignorance is best way to follow.

Pckts:bYou must follow some rules.


This is request not to debate without any proof or backup.

 

Don't see how I am not following the rules?
I am responding to claims with evidence and accounts while not using any bad language or in a argumentative way. Notice who is the person calling names here, its not me. Peter and I had a discussion on debating and I am pretty sure that I am following the guidelines used. I am attacking no body, insulting no one, I am contributing to a debate that, Copters, Peter, Gaute and tigerluver have all discussed.
Tigerluver created a thread for this but Gaute deleted it. So I'm not sure what you want me to do?
If accounts are presented, I should be able to rebuttal with other factual accounts, especially if claims are made with out actual backing. So if somebody says that ALL photos of sumatran tigers are taken by photo graph, and I don't agree, whats the harm.

So when Gaute says this
"Pckts said: "you have no actual data to back a single claim on this topic"
Are you challenge me??? Are you SURE about this??? Really sure??? You know what is coming now. The waves that I create can't be stooped, you should know that already. You want to suffer like many hard-core-lion-fans in the past of AVA???"

My response is,
Yes @Gaute, I am challenging your claim. I am now offering photographs taken in sumatra, some with the photographers names attached

http://www.arkive.org/tiger/panthera-tig...G4089.html

So if you disagree, I suggest you ask
Gerald Cubbitt
or
Veronique Savigney
or
Mark Lienfield
or
Alain Compost
etc...
even
Alan Ranbowitz did a documentory there
http://www.panthera.org/node/2883 Reply