Eyes on or hands on? A discussion of human interference

[GuateGojira]

I don't need your interpretation of my words, as any person with a grain of brain can see that ALL my posts show the clear idea and the clear data. Is you who has twisted the information, showing a retrograde point of view with no purpose.

Radiocollaring animals is safe and very good method to study animals in the field and the next goal of any scientists in the future will be to radiocollared more tigers, when the population will be stable and the time and money allow it.

At the end, your opinion, although wort of respect, is just that, your opinion. From my part, I agree with scientists, like always, as they have worked with tigers directly and they know they business. Park rangers and photographs opinions (qualitative data, not proved trough repetition) are have few value against he word of the top scientists (quantitative data, obtained trough scientific and statistical methods that can be proved in the field) and the time have proved them right. In fact, Russia is a great example of that, where tigers are now rising and the government is making great efforts to save they tigers, unlike India, which is stuck in a silly idea that tigers most be left alone and they will save themselves.

So, radiocollaring tigers is wort the risk, specially when the procedure is very safe and the data that we can obtain is incredible valuable for tiger conservation. Bhutan is the next steep for this type of studies. Then and ONLY then, we will able to know what are the driving factors on the unique ecology and sociology of this population.
  Reply