Lions of Sabi Sands

[Potato]

(06-20-2023, 01:03 PM)Tr1x24 Wrote: Sure, just like 2 "big and strong" Talamatis run away from 3 "small and weak" Kambulas lol.

You suggest I ever said such a think? I said there that I assume Talamatis should be bigger then Kambulas which is probably true. We could see on a video of 1 Kambula male running after Blonde Talamati that talamati male looked much taller despite Kambula male was closer to camera which should make him appear bigger than he really is by perspective effect. The other think is that Kambula males are older and twice Talamatis numbers so they should be easly the stronger coalition. If it would be 2vs2 then Talamatis probably would dominate Kambula males, but it isn't 2vs2.

(06-20-2023, 01:03 PM)Tr1x24 Wrote: Look at 6 Birmigham Breakaways who are even older then Nkhulus, they could easily beat any coalition in Timbavati, but they are yet to make a move, they are always split and scattered, and who knows what will happen..

You look at dynamics at the moment like they are never changing. Birmingham breakaway males have everythink to became dominant force in the arena and it is only matter of time before they became that and same think is for Nkhulu males.

(06-20-2023, 01:03 PM)Tr1x24 Wrote: I like comments like this, like it is arena where you throw 6 males vs 2 to fight to death, wild is very much different, just remember 6 Vurhamis vs 3 Mjejanes.

1. Mjejanes were brutes in their prime and manage to pull this 3vs6 up, through not every male coalition is such powerhouse as Mjejane and Nkhulus are not necessarily as uncapable as Vurhamis. Numbers are the most important factor when coalitions face each others. Sure you can pull some examples like Mjejane vs Vurhamis, but in great most of cases then bigger coalition ousts smaller, not the other way around.

2. 6vs2 is yet on another level of difficulty than 3vs6. Reply