Cryptozoology, Ghosts, Aliens and other mysteries

[Pckts]

(11-02-2014, 07:46 PM)'chaos' Wrote:

(11-01-2014, 11:51 PM)'Pckts' Wrote: Every person in the world has a camera on them now, if a species like bigfoot exists, it would of been documented. Its to large and its life requirements would be the same as any other primate, it would of been viewed by now. We all no that for a species to live, its needs males and females and a decent size population. If a animal with that size and the same life requirements existed,  we would know it.


 

As stated earlier in this thread, I'm in agreement. The lack of any documented physical evidence - aside from footprints - makes it
difficult to support the theory bigfoot exists. But, with so many sightings from diverse locales over several centuries, it makes for an
interesting argument.
 

 

Not really, if it has never been documented by actual experts or photographed by now, its not really a question to me. There is a reason that the Lochness monster was never seen, a yeti, a whale eating squid, a fire breathing dragon etc.
Humans have a tendency to exagerate when they see something astonishing and especially during a time when they may go through their entire lives without ever having seen such a creature.
Imagine seeing a massive grizzly but never knowing that they existed before. You would describe it as a giant monster with huge teeth and a deafening roar. Imagine that image is told down through the generations, it would only get more exagerated. There was no internet, no books, no wild life biologists, just your word. Thats why they call them "fish tales", we love to make things bigger or crazier than what they really are.
  Reply