Yellowstone Wolf Directory

[TheNormalGuy]

Famous Wolf 632F aka "Tripod" 

[Founding Alpha Female of The Short-Lived Grayling Creek Pack]

a.    This wolf of Cougar Creek had 3 legs
b.    She probably lost her leg in a snare along the park boundary.
c.     Gray
d.    Alpha Grayling Creek wolf in 2009
e.    Died from natural unknown causes in November 2009.
f.      Gave birth to 2 pups to mate and alpha male of Grayling creek 647M
g.    Great Grand Daughter of 9F

---

Recap

ID : #632F
Nickname : “Tripod”
Sex : Female
Color : Gray
Weight : 99 lbs [45 kg] [Adult] [January 2008]
Packs : 

• Cougar Creek
• Grayling Creek
  

Lifespan : April 2004- November 5th 2009 [5 1/2 years old]
Status in Grayling Creek : Alpha Female
Mate : 647M
Ancestry : 

• Daughter of 151F & 257M
• Grand-Daughter of 2M and 7F
• Great-Grand-Daughter of 5F/4M & 9F/?
  

---

Wolf 632F or "Tripod" (Cougar Creek) 

"The female from Cougar Creek (#632) had at least two pups that survived, but she died late in the year, probably killed by other wolves."

Source : Yellowstone Wolf Project Annual Report 2009

---

Source of these informations : 

Yellowstone Wolf Projects Annual Reports

"Charting Yellowstone Wolves (25th Anniversary)"

(2009)

(The link to the Wolf Annual Reports is in the first post of the thread)

*Edit of this post will come in shorter or later moments  !*

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*Note* : I transferred this thread to my forum : The Domain of the Wolf and updated and added many informations from the multiples sources I red. Hope it is understandable.  Also, there is a problem with the spacing between texts sometimes which i can't fix. Sorry for the inconvenience it might cause.

Although all the informations are based from my review, searches and documentation of my searches on the Internet, some informations can be, and are, inaccurate due to new papers coming out, new genetics analyses, etc etc.

Reply