Overrated size of Munna aka Langda of Kanha National Park

[Pckts]

(08-16-2014, 08:40 AM)'Siegfried' Wrote:

Quote:  

 
 

(08-15-2014, 10:43 PM)'Roflcopters' Wrote: I think most of the Tiger fans are absurd with their claims of 250kg prime male tigers on average, truth is.. only a handful of tigers have the capability of reaching such a weight.. everything else, estimates and what not are all bogus.

 
Munna is a dominant male and probably one of the fiercist but don't mistaken his dominance for size, he's an average sized tiger over hyped and heavily riddled with fanaticism. 
 


 

I agree.  Terms like "monster" are all too often used to describe average sized tigers.  For some reason a 400 pound big cat just isn't quite big enough anymore.  

 

 

Nobody is giving weights!
How many times does this need to be said?

So lets use Copters logic...

*This image is copyright of its original author

*This image is copyright of its original author

*This image is copyright of its original author

*This image is copyright of its original author

*This image is copyright of its original author

*This image is copyright of its original author

"overratted??"

So if we throw away all the eye witness accounts and videos which all show and state Munna as being one of the largest or the largest tiger in Kahna (during his prime)
Nothing changes the fact that these images show him to be massive as well.
Funny these were not used during attempt to discredit Munna, but this debate is sealed.

On to the next one Reply