Overrated size of Munna aka Langda of Kanha National Park

[TheLioness]

I'm not cherry picking, i really hate how people say that, i didn't go online and look for the worst picture, it is a picture of him walking, other pictures he may look impressive in than this one yes, but this was the one i choose and the other tigers as well could have pictures showing even better muscular ect.

Eyewitness accounts really mean nothing, it is very hard to judge even for experts, so opinions on their size could be wrong, peter and guate have already poved this, you've never accepted estimates given to lions by lion experts over 220kg and ect, however you believe munna is close to 300kg? Doubtful, he is not impressive to me and others on here, I beleive he falls in the average or slightly above average looking tiger. Konda was larger as well as the two males that killed konda IMO than munna. Killing two other big tigers does not prove he is a big tiger, the other tigers possibly werent as skilled and other factors, prey injury ect.
http://www.ndtv.com/video/player/news/ka...gle/224156

He looks slinder, not as massive and tank like as many other tigers I've seen. I really don't see what is impressive about him? You quote the link 7 tigress picture then when i post male lions that dwarf their lionesses as much and or other tigers as well, you make excuse it depends on the lioness tigress ect.

What do you think of Bamera? You think he may be smaller than langda/munna.

*This image is copyright of its original author

Here is a nice picture of munna, he does look rather nice and thicker in this picture, however IMO he still looks to be average to me, compared to some other tigers.

*This image is copyright of its original author

How do you rank munna over the others? Reply