Carnivorous dinosaurs other than the famous t-rex and spinosaurus..

[JurassicDD]

(12-23-2019, 01:39 AM)DinoFan83 Wrote: I never said it was inaccurate nor too conservative. I said that while it can be considered accurate depending on interpretation of data, it is more conservative than other mass estimates that are also accurate depending on data interpretation. All of them can work. Just go with whatever floats your boat.

It's not even MUCPv-Ch1 I am referring to; just about every GDI I know of, including the one you posted, gives 7 tonnes for it. I am referring to things such as MUCPv-95, MCF-PVPH-108.145, and SGM-DIN 1, where there are multiple possible ways to accurately interpret the given data.

And you have been told what the issues are with using these specimens countless times now by people that know far better than both you and me. You simply go with of date higher-end estimates for Carnosaurs because you like them it's just that simple. There is no point in interacting with you because you want to believe what you want to believe. I have made this mistake way too many times and sadly other users on other forums such as the world of animals are doing it aswell you are pretty much having this same conversation with another user on there its pretty much the same convo you have been having with countless people. It's just one big endless circle. Reply