Carnivorous dinosaurs other than the famous t-rex and spinosaurus..

[tigerluver]

(10-01-2019, 04:11 AM)GuateGojira Wrote: @tigerluver, this is all what is know for the specimen MUCPv-95:

*This image is copyright of its original author

As you can see, it is not too much, all the other calculations are pure speculation and sensacionalism, created even by the original authors. Even worst, as you know, there is a lot o variation on the size of skull in modern vertebrates, so the same obviously will apply to dinosaurs. In this case, this could be just a "normal sized" Giganotosaurus with a big jaw.

This is the holotype MUCPv-Ch 1:

*This image is copyright of its original author

Now you can compare them. But before to use the scale bar, take in count what Franois says in his post at DevianArt (in the image posted by @Verdugo).

The amount of fossil found in itself should not take away from the conclusions. If I were to show you half a lion mandible and a full skeleton of a leopard, it'd be safe to say how much bigger the lion is than the leopard despite the lion evidence being very fragmentary. What does take away from the conclusions is the lack of numerical comparison in the 1998 paper and then the subsequent issue of the second mandible being only 2% taller. Were the tooth diameters ever compared? Reply