Lion Predation

[Pckts]

(08-11-2014, 03:42 AM)'Pantherinae' Wrote:

'Pckts dateline='' Wrote: Tiger attacks on Elephant are common, reported, viewed etc. 
That was simply a example. It proves that tigers attack any animal face to face or ambush. It was simpley used to disprove Jinen claim.

The only reason that Raja video was a "little charge" was because raja used to apply the death grip. That was used as proof of Tigers attacking face to face with animals that fight back.

You stated that the "Guar didn't fight back at all" originally then you stated that it was a "little charge".
Im sorry, the words you are saying are downgrading to a Tiger. 


 

Just saw The video again and The gaur is turning around and Raja jumps away and battles the gaur and gets a throat bite! That's how I see it. 

You are mad meanig I'm talking The tiger down, I'm not You must have had bad experience at other forums since You are so defensive, everything I'm saying is absolutley not talking down an animal down! I'm just saying what's right in my mind, I'm not saying I'm right just my thought's and opinions! 

Describing a hunt is difficult as many sees it different! 

 

You have a way of fitting in "claims" in your debates that are deceiving.
Just like you still will not admit that the Gaur charged raja. I'm sorry, that is blatant and denying it is false.
Same with Rhino predation and Elephant predation. 
Same with the water buffalo vs Gaur size and comparision. 
Same with the Bamera claim or Waghdoh claim, 
This statement "

Hunting heavy prey in The open is far harder than with ambush such as kruger Lions, leopards and tigers are usualy hunting.

How could you know if ambushing prey large prey is easier than open hunting large prey?
If anything, ambushing large prey means that you are getting the prey with all the energy they have, not after they have ran long distance and sapped their energy. So once again, every situation is different and every hunt will have its own challenges. 

My point is, you may not say it out right, but you certainly imply things quite often. 


and Yes, I have had many bad expierences with other forums (as we all have) and that is why I am so thorough with the research I do. So I don't make these claims with out backing. I am simply responding to your statements, if you don't like the comment, I'm sorry. But "defensive" is completely different than suspicious. 

None of the above mentioned are to re start those debates because I will not. They are used as examples. 

This isn't met to offend you, it is simply observational and I mean no disrespect. 


  Reply