Girth Comparaison of Animals

[brotherbear]

Yes, I understand this Spalea, but this has nothing whatsoever to do with comparing the girth of a tiger with the girth of a grizzly. 
At equal head-and-body length, which very closely coincides with bipedal height, the grizzly proves to have a much greater girth than the tiger. 
That is it. This is how you compare their girth; be it chest girth, neck circumference, or girth of limbs. It is like comparing a man of Europe with a man of America, each standing six feet tall. A completely fair comparison. Pckts has this notion that to fairly compare their girth, you compare them at equal weight. Nonsense! Girth produces weight. Naturally the animal with the greater girth is going to have a weight advantage. To shrink the grizzly down to "tiger-girth-size" is making the comparison void because the results are then meaningless. Reply